Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul;57(4):418-21.
doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrw017. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

A report that Fukushima residents are concerned about radiation from Land, Food and Radon

Yuki Tamari  1 , Yujiro Kuroda  2 , Ryu Miyagawa  3 , Kanabu Nawa  1 , Akira Sakumi  1 , Naoko Sakata  4 , Nozomi Mizushima  5 , Osamu Sakura  5 , Yumi Iwamitsu  6 , Kazuhisa Takemura  7 , Keiichi Nakagawa  8
Affiliations

A report that Fukushima residents are concerned about radiation from Land, Food and Radon

Yuki Tamari et al. J Radiat Res. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

The Great East Japan Earthquake and subsequent TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster occurred on 11 March 2011, which caused the leakage of radioactive materials into the environment. In this study, we report public concerns about radiation in Fukushima and Tokyo almost one year after the nuclear disaster. We examined the public concerns by analyzing the data from 1022 participants, 555 in Fukushima and 467 in Tokyo. They were asked whether they were concerned about radiation from some of six different types of sources, which could be answered in a binary way, 'yes' or 'no'. We found not only similarities, but also significant differences in the degrees of concerns between Fukushima residents and Tokyo ones. Fukushima residents more concerned about radiation from land, food and radon in larger rate than that of Tokyo ones, while Tokyo residents were concerned about radiation from medical care. Residents in neither location were concerned about radiation from space. Our results suggested that careful risk communication should be undertaken, adaptively organized depending on location and other factors, e.g. comprehension about radiation, presence of the experience of evacuation, and also age and gender of the people.

Keywords: Daiichi nuclear disaster; radiation; radiation source; risk communication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Questionnaire survey sheet, which was actually conducted in Japanese
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Nuclear Regulation Authority. Monitoring Air Dose Rates from a Series of Aircraft Surveys 30 months after the Fukushima Daiichi NPS accident. https://www.nsr.go.jp/data/000067233.pdf (3 March 2016, date last accessed).
    1. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. Areas to Which Evacuation Orders Have Been Issued. http://www.meti.go.jp/english/earthquake/nuclear/roadmap/pdf/141001MapOf... (30 January 2015, date last accessed).
    1. Reconstruction Agency. Hinansha nado no kazu [Heisei 27 nen 9 gatsu 29 nichi] (The Number of Evacuees [29 September 2015]). http://www.reconstruction.go.jp/topics/main-cat2/sub-cat2-1/20150929_hin... (16 October 2015, date last accessed).
    1. Plough A, Krimsky S. The emergence of risk communication studies: social and political context. Sci Technol Human Values 1987;12:4–10.
    1. Slovic P. Perception of risk from radiation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 1996;68:165–80.