[Comparison of empirical treatment with antibiotics in community acquired lung diseases]

Abstract

From December 1984 to June 1986, a prospective clinical trial was carried out in 48 patients with acute community-acquired pneumonia, comparing 2 possible therapeutic schemes: one, using only one antibiotic (roxithromycin: RXT) presumptively active on most of the germs usually involved. In a second group, the identification of the germs involved was attempted on the basis of clinical, epidemiological and radiological data, followed by treatment with the antibiotic/s (ATB) known to be more active against the suspected organisms. The dosage of RXT was 300 mg/day, orally during an average of 9 days. The mean duration of treatment in ATB group was 12 days. In both groups, the following microorganisms were identified: RXT group: St. pneumoniae (13 cases), H. influenzae (1), B. catarrhalis (1); mixed infections: St. pneumoniae + H. influenzae (2); Mycoplasma pneumoniae (3) and 4 patients with unidentified germ; in ATB group: St. aureus (3), St. pneumoniae (5), H. influenzae (2), B. catarrhalis (1); mixed infections: St. aureus + Enterobacter + E. coli (1); Mycoplasma pneumoniae (2) and 10 patients with unidentified germ. The therapeutic results were satisfactory (curation rate: 92%) and similar for both groups of treatment, concluding that both schemes are comparable. Therefore, the choice for one or the other scheme should be based on other reasons, such as easy administration and cost of the treatment.