Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 16;98(6):466-74.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00705.

Dynamic Stabilization with Active Locking Plates Delivers Faster, Stronger, and More Symmetric Fracture-Healing

Affiliations

Dynamic Stabilization with Active Locking Plates Delivers Faster, Stronger, and More Symmetric Fracture-Healing

Michael Bottlang et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. .

Abstract

Background: Axial dynamization of fractures can promote healing, and overly stiff fixation can suppress healing. A novel technology, termed active plating, provides controlled axial dynamization by the elastic suspension of locking holes within the plate. This prospective, controlled animal study evaluated the effect of active plates on fracture-healing in an established ovine osteotomy model. We hypothesized that symmetric axial dynamization with active plates stimulates circumferential callus and delivers faster and stronger healing relative to standard locking plates.

Methods: Twelve sheep were randomly assigned to receive a standard locking plate or an active locking plate for stabilization of a 3-mm tibial osteotomy gap. The only difference between plates was that locking holes of active plates were elastically suspended, allowing up to 1.5 mm of axial motion at the fracture. Fracture-healing was analyzed weekly on radiographs. After sacrifice at nine weeks postoperatively, callus volume and distribution were assessed by computed tomography. Finally, to determine their strength, healed tibiae and contralateral tibiae were tested in torsion until failure.

Results: At each follow-up, the active locking plate group had more callus (p < 0.001) than the standard locking plate group. At postoperative week 6, all active locking plate group specimens had bridging callus at the three visible cortices. In standard locking plate group specimens, only 50% of these cortices had bridged. Computed tomography demonstrated that all active locking plate group specimens and one of the six standard locking plate group specimens had developed circumferential callus. Torsion tests after plate removal demonstrated that active locking plate group specimens recovered 81% of their native strength and were 399% stronger than standard locking plate group specimens (p < 0.001), which had recovered only 17% of their native strength. All active locking plate group specimens failed by spiral fracture outside the callus zone, but standard locking plate group specimens fractured through the osteotomy gap.

Conclusions: Symmetric axial dynamization with active locking plates stimulates circumferential callus and yields faster and stronger healing than standard locking plates.

Clinical relevance: The stimulatory effect of controlled motion on fracture-healing by active locking plates has the potential to reduce healing complications and to shorten the time to return to function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Figs. 1-A through 1-D Standard and active locking plates. Fig. 1-A The standard locking plate (LP) and active locking plate (ACTIVE) were identical, with the exception of elastic suspension of locking holes in ACTIVE plates. Figs. 1-B and 1-C Cross-section and semitransparent illustration of an ACTIVE plate. Fig. 1-D Sliding element with locking hole, embedded in silicone envelope.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Figs. 2-A and 2-B Construct stiffness and interfragmentary motion at 700 N for both locking plate constructs. Fig. 2-A Active locking plate (ACTIVE) constructs were up to 89% less stiff than the standard locking plate (LP) constructs. Fig. 2-B ACTIVE constructs induced symmetric motion of 1.0 to 1.2 mm at 700-N compression, and LP constructs induced asymmetric motion of <0.2 mm. The error bars indicate the standard deviation.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Figs. 3-A and 3-B Periosteal callus formation and callus at postoperative week 6 for both groups. Fig. 3-A Progression of periosteal callus formation. The active locking plate (ACTIVE) group developed significantly more callus (p < 0.001), indicated by asterisks, than the standard locking plate (LP) group at each time point from postoperative weeks 3 through 9. The error bars indicate the standard deviation. Fig. 3-B By week 6, all visible cortices had bridged in the ACTIVE group, but only 50% of these cortices had bridged in the LP group, as shown in two representative specimens.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Transverse cross-sections adjacent to the osteotomy and volumetric renderings depict circumferential and abundant callus in the active locking plate (ACTIVE) group, but not the standard locking plate (LP) group. Images depict the medial (plated) cortex to the right.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Figs. 5-A and 5-B Photograph of the active locking plate (ACTIVE) specimen and scatterplot showing the strength of the healed tibiae in the ACTIVE group and the standard locking plate (LP) group. Fig. 5-A Torsion test setup with ACTIVE specimen. Fig. 5-B Strength of healing in terms of energy to failure in torsion, normalized to the native strength of contralateral tibiae (100%).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Failure mode: all active locking plate (ACTIVE) specimens failed by spiral fracture proximal or distal to the osteotomy gap, but standard locking plate (LP) specimens fractured through either completely or partially through the osteotomy gap. The arrows indicate the ends of the fracture.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bottlang M, Lesser M, Koerber J, Doornink J, von Rechenberg B, Augat P, Fitzpatrick DC, Madey SM, Marsh JL. Far cortical locking can improve healing of fractures stabilized with locking plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010. July 7;92(7):1652-60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Claes LE, Heigele CA, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Kaspar D, Seidl W, Margevicius KJ, Augat P. Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing process. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998. October;355(Suppl):S132-47. - PubMed
    1. Foux A, Yeadon AJ, Uhthoff HK. Improved fracture healing with less rigid plates. A biomechanical study in dogs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997. June;339:232-45. - PubMed
    1. Goodship AE, Kenwright J. The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985. August;67(4):650-5. - PubMed
    1. Kenwright J, Richardson JB, Cunningham JL, White SH, Goodship AE, Adams MA, Magnussen PA, Newman JH. Axial movement and tibial fractures. A controlled randomised trial of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991. July;73(4):654-9. - PubMed