Scientometric analysis: A technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewers
- PMID: 26985429
- PMCID: PMC4776541
- DOI: 10.4103/2279-042X.176562
Scientometric analysis: A technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewers
Abstract
The nature of performing a scientific research is a process that has several different components which consist of identifying the key research question(s), choices of scientific approach for the study and data collection, data analysis, and finally reporting on results. Generally, peer review is a series of procedures in the evaluation of a creative work or performance by other people, who work in the same or related field, with the aim of maintaining and improving the quality of work or performance in that field. The assessment of the achievement of every scientist, and thus indirectly determining his reputation in the scientific community of these publications, especially journals, is done through the so-called impact factor index. The impact factor predicts or estimates that how many annual citations article may receive after its publication. Evaluation of scientific productivity and assessment of the published articles of researchers and scientists can be made through the so-called H-index. The quality of published results of scientific work largely depends on knowledge sources that are used in the preparation, which means that it should be considered to serve the purpose and the very relevance of the information used. Scientometrics as a field of science covers all aforementioned issues, and scientometric analysis is obligatory for quality assessment of the scientific validity of published articles and other type of publications.
Keywords: Scientific publications; scientific validity; scientometrics.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.Ann Ital Chir. 2016;87:1-3. Ann Ital Chir. 2016. PMID: 28474609
-
How Scientometrics Became the Most Important Science for Researchers of All Specialties.Moscow Univ Biol Sci Bull. 2020;75(4):159-163. doi: 10.3103/S0096392520040057. Epub 2021 Feb 8. Moscow Univ Biol Sci Bull. 2020. PMID: 33583970 Free PMC article.
-
International scientific communications in the field of colorectal tumour markers.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 May 27;9(5):127-138. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i5.127. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017. PMID: 28603585 Free PMC article.
-
[Toward a model of communications in public health in Latin America and the Caribbean].Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2005 Dec;18(6):427-38. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892005001000006. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2005. PMID: 16536929 Review. Spanish.
-
The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Jan 17;165(2-3):115-28. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.013. Epub 2006 Jun 19. Forensic Sci Int. 2007. PMID: 16784827 Review.
Cited by
-
Deciphering the past status and future tendency: a comprehensive scientometric study on developmental dysplasia of the hip.J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 19;19(1):853. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05358-8. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 39702394 Free PMC article.
-
Peer Review - Essential for Article and Journal Scientific Assessment and Validity.Med Arch. 2016 Jun;70(3):168-71. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2016.70.168-171. Epub 2016 May 31. Med Arch. 2016. PMID: 27594739 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Indices of Change, Expectations, and Popularity of Biological Treatments for Major Depressive Disorder between 1988 and 2017: A Scientometric Analysis.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 26;16(13):2255. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132255. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31247926 Free PMC article.
-
Predatory Journals and Publishers - Dilemmas: How to Assess it and How to Avoid it?Med Arch. 2021 Oct;75(5):328-334. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2021.75.328-334. Med Arch. 2021. PMID: 35169352 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
On the Occasion of the Symposium "Scientometry, Citation, Plagiarism and Predatory in Scientific Publishing", Sarajevo, 2021.Med Arch. 2021 Dec;75(6):408-412. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2021.75.408-412. Med Arch. 2021. PMID: 35169366 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Masic I, Kujundzic E. Sarajevo: Avicena; 2013. Science editing in biomedicine and humanites; pp. 261–6.
-
- Clark R. Self-Plagiarism and Self-Citation: A Practical Guide Based on Underlying Principles. [Last accessed on 2015 Aug 09]. Available from: http://www.rogerclarke.com/SOS/SCSP-09.html .
-
- COPE. Committee on Publication Ethics. [Last accessed on 2015 Jul 12]. Available from: http://www.publicationethics.org .
-
- Dooley JJ. A note on good research practice. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2013;15:1–2.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources