Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jan-Mar;5(1):1-6.
doi: 10.4103/2279-042X.176562.

Scientometric analysis: A technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewers

Affiliations
Review

Scientometric analysis: A technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewers

Izet Masic. J Res Pharm Pract. 2016 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

The nature of performing a scientific research is a process that has several different components which consist of identifying the key research question(s), choices of scientific approach for the study and data collection, data analysis, and finally reporting on results. Generally, peer review is a series of procedures in the evaluation of a creative work or performance by other people, who work in the same or related field, with the aim of maintaining and improving the quality of work or performance in that field. The assessment of the achievement of every scientist, and thus indirectly determining his reputation in the scientific community of these publications, especially journals, is done through the so-called impact factor index. The impact factor predicts or estimates that how many annual citations article may receive after its publication. Evaluation of scientific productivity and assessment of the published articles of researchers and scientists can be made through the so-called H-index. The quality of published results of scientific work largely depends on knowledge sources that are used in the preparation, which means that it should be considered to serve the purpose and the very relevance of the information used. Scientometrics as a field of science covers all aforementioned issues, and scientometric analysis is obligatory for quality assessment of the scientific validity of published articles and other type of publications.

Keywords: Scientific publications; scientific validity; scientometrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
H-index from a plot of decreasing citations for numbered papers (This index is calculated on the basis of the list of publications ranked in order of the time when they are quoted. The quality of published results of scientific work largely depends on knowledge sources that are used in the preparation, which means that it should be considered to serve the purpose and the very relevance of the information used. Scientometrics as a field of science covers all aforementioned issues, and scientometric analysis is obligatory for quality assessment of scientific validity of published articles and other type of publications)[6]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Masic I, Kujundzic E. Sarajevo: Avicena; 2013. Science editing in biomedicine and humanites; pp. 261–6.
    1. Clark R. Self-Plagiarism and Self-Citation: A Practical Guide Based on Underlying Principles. [Last accessed on 2015 Aug 09]. Available from: http://www.rogerclarke.com/SOS/SCSP-09.html .
    1. COPE. Committee on Publication Ethics. [Last accessed on 2015 Jul 12]. Available from: http://www.publicationethics.org .
    1. Dooley JJ. A note on good research practice. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2013;15:1–2.
    1. Masic I. Plagiarism in scientific publishing. Acta Inform Med. 2012;20:208–13. - PMC - PubMed