Impact of Clinic Closures on Women Obtaining Abortion Services After Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas
- PMID: 26985603
- PMCID: PMC4985084
- DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303134
Impact of Clinic Closures on Women Obtaining Abortion Services After Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the additional burdens experienced by Texas abortion patients whose nearest in-state clinic was one of more than half of facilities providing abortion that had closed after the introduction of House Bill 2 in 2013.
Methods: In mid-2014, we surveyed Texas-resident women seeking abortions in 10 Texas facilities (n = 398), including both Planned Parenthood-affiliated clinics and independent providers that performed more than 1500 abortions in 2013 and provided procedures up to a gestational age of at least 14 weeks from last menstrual period. We compared indicators of burden for women whose nearest clinic in 2013 closed and those whose nearest clinic remained open.
Results: For women whose nearest clinic closed (38%), the mean one-way distance traveled was 85 miles, compared with 22 miles for women whose nearest clinic remained open (P ≤ .001). After adjustment, more women whose nearest clinic closed traveled more than 50 miles (44% vs 10%), had out-of-pocket expenses greater than $100 (32% vs 20%), had a frustrated demand for medication abortion (37% vs 22%), and reported that it was somewhat or very hard to get to the clinic (36% vs 18%; P < .05).
Conclusions: Clinic closures after House Bill 2 resulted in significant burdens for women able to obtain care.
Figures
Republished in
-
Impact of Clinic Closures on Women Obtaining Abortion Services After Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas.Am J Public Health. 2022 Sep;112(9):1297-1304. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303134r. Am J Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35969823 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment in
-
Lessons From Texas: Widespread Consequences of Assaults on Abortion Access.Am J Public Health. 2016 Jun;106(6):970-1. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303220. Am J Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27153009 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Examination of Bias in Study of Clinic Closures.Am J Public Health. 2017 Apr;107(4):e24. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303635. Am J Public Health. 2017. PMID: 28272946 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Gerdts et al. Respond.Am J Public Health. 2017 Apr;107(4):e24-e25. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303636. Am J Public Health. 2017. PMID: 28272947 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Guttmacher Institute. Laws affecting reproductive health and rights: state trends at midyear, 2015. News in context. Available at: http://www.guttmacher.org/media/inthenews/2015/07/01. Accessed November 23, 2015.
-
- Texas 83rd State Legislature. Bill Text: Texas HB No. 2. 2013. Available at: https://legiscan.com/TX/text/HB2/id/870667. Accessed November 23, 2015.
-
- Colman S, Joyce T. Regulating abortion: impact on patients and providers in Texas. J Policy Anal Manage. 2011;30(4):775–797.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
