Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Mar 17:13:25.
doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0145-9.

Engaging with community-based public and private mid-level providers for promoting the use of modern contraceptive methods in rural Pakistan: results from two innovative birth spacing interventions

Syed Khurram Azmat  1   2   3 , Waqas Hameed  4 , Hasan Bin Hamza  5 , Ghulam Mustafa  4 , Muhammad Ishaque  4 , Ghazunfer Abbas  4 , Omar Farooq Khan  4 , Jamshaid Asghar  4 , Erik Munroe  6 , Safdar Ali  4 , Wajahat Hussain  4 , Sajid Ali  4 , Aftab Ahmed  4 , Moazzam Ali  7 , Marleen Temmerman  8
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Engaging with community-based public and private mid-level providers for promoting the use of modern contraceptive methods in rural Pakistan: results from two innovative birth spacing interventions

Syed Khurram Azmat et al. Reprod Health. .

Abstract

Background: Family planning (FP) interventions aimed at reducing population growth have negligible during the last two decades in Pakistan. Innovative FP interventions that help reduce the growing population burden are the need of the hour. Marie Stopes Society--Pakistan implemented an operational research project--'Evidence for Innovating to Save Lives', to explore effective and viable intervention models that can promote healthy timing and spacing of pregnancy in rural and under-served communities of Sindh, Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa provinces of Pakistan.

Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental (pre- and post-intervention with control arm) study to assess the effectiveness of each of the two intervention models, (1) Suraj model (meaning 'Sun' in English), which uses social franchises (SF) along with a demand-side financing (DSF) approach using free vouchers, and (2) Community Midwife (CMW) model, in promoting the use of modern contraceptive methods compared to respective controls. Baseline and endline cross-sectional household surveys were conducted, 24 months apart, by recruiting 5566 and 6316 married women of reproductive age (MWRA) respectively. We used Stata version 8 to report the net effect of interventions on outcome indicators using difference-in-differences analysis. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to assess the net effect of the intervention on current contraceptive use, keeping time constant and adjusting for other variables in the model.

Results: The Suraj model was effective in significantly increasing awareness about FP methods among MWRA by 14% percentage points, current contraceptive use by 5% percentage points and long term modern method--intrauterine device (IUD) use by 6% percentage points. The CMW model significantly increased contraceptive awareness by 28% percentage points, ever use of contraceptives by 7% percentage points and, IUD use by 3% percentage points. Additionally the Suraj intervention led to a 35% greater prevalence (prevalence ratio: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.22-1.50) of contraceptive use among MWRA.

Conclusion: Suraj intervention highlights the importance of embedding subsidized FP services within the communities of the beneficiaries. The outcomes of the CMW intervention also improved the use of long-term contraceptives. These findings indicate the necessity of designing and implementing FP initiatives involving local mid-level providers to expand contraceptive coverage in under-served areas.

Keywords: Birth spacing; Community midwives; Contraception; Family planning; Rural Pakistan; Suraj; Vouchers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overall study design flow chart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Jain AK, Mahmood A, Sathar ZA, Masood I. Reducing unmet need and unwanted childbearing: Evidence from a panel survey in Pakistan. Studies in Family Planning. 2014;45(2):277–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00389.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Population Data Sheet 2014 [Internet]. PRB. 2014. Available from: http://www.prb.org/pdf14/2014-world-populationdata-sheet_eng.pdf.
    1. Bhutta ZA, Hafeez A, Rizvi A, Ali N, Khan A, Ahmad F, et al. Reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health in Pakistan: challenges and opportunities. The Lancet. 2013;381(9884):2207–18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61999-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson BO, Yip CH, Ramsey SD, Bengoa R, Barun S. Breast cancer in limited- resource countries: health care systems and public policy. Breast J. 2006;12(1):S54–S69. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00203.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Institute of Population Studies Pakistan, Macro International Inc . Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2012–13. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan; 2014.

Publication types

MeSH terms