Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Oct;31(5):331-6.
doi: 10.1159/000438661. Epub 2015 Oct 6.

Minimally Invasive Techniques and Hybrid Operations for Esophageal Cancer

Christoph Wullstein  1 , Hye-Yoen Ro-Papanikolaou  1 , Christoph Klingebiel  1 , Koray Ersahin  1 , Rene Carolus  1
Affiliations
Review

Minimally Invasive Techniques and Hybrid Operations for Esophageal Cancer

Christoph Wullstein et al. Viszeralmedizin. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is slowly gaining acceptance due to advantages in short-term outcome. While evidence is slowly increasing, the discussion about MIE is still controversial.

Methods: A literature review was performed to compare MIE with open esophagectomy (OE). Current studies are summarized in view of short- and long-term outcome as well as oncological accuracy.

Results: The majority of studies show that MIE is associated with a significant reduction of pulmonary complications, blood loss, and shorter length of stay on the intensive care unit. Pulmonary complications are reduced by 14-65%. MIE shows an improved quality of life 6 weeks after surgery. There is some evidence that the endoscopic reintervention rate may be higher after MIE than after OE. Mortality rates do not differ. Regarding oncological results, the rate of R0 resections is comparable between MIE and OE, as is the number of retrieved lymph nodes. Long-term survival seems to be comparable. A few single center trials suggest oncological advantages of MIE over OE concerning the number of lymph nodes, R0 resection rate, and 1-year survival.

Conclusion: Current evidence supports that MIE has advantages over OE in the short-term outcome. Oncological results are comparable to those achieved by OE. As a result, MIE has already been included in current guidelines for the treatment of esophageal cancer.

Keywords: Esophagectomy; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery; Outcome; Video-assisted thoracic surgery, VATS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Minimally invasive esophagectomy: subtypes.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Lymphadenectomy during laparoscopy in minimally invasive esophagectomy for distal adenocarcinoma.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Anatomical orientation in minimally invasive esophagectomy in prone position.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Extent of lymphadenectomy in the inferior mediastinum achieved during minimally invasive esophagectomy in prone position.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hulscher JB, Van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, Wijnhoven BPL, Tijssen JGP, Fockens P, Stalmeier PFM, ten Kate FJW, van Dekken H, Obertrop H, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJB. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1662–1669. - PubMed
    1. Mariette C, Piessen G, Triboulet JP. Therapeutic strategies in oesophageal carcinoma: role of surgery and other modalities. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:545–553. - PubMed
    1. Atkins BZ, Shah AS, Hutcheson KA, Mangum JH, Pappas TH, Harpole DH, Jr, D'Amico TA. Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:1170–1176. - PubMed
    1. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–1137. - PubMed
    1. Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, Faiz O, Hanna GB. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study. Ann Surg. 2012;255:197–203. - PubMed