When is bigger better? The effects of group size on the evolution of helping behaviours
- PMID: 26989856
- DOI: 10.1111/brv.12260
When is bigger better? The effects of group size on the evolution of helping behaviours
Abstract
Understanding the evolution of sociality in humans and other species requires understanding how selection on social behaviour varies with group size. However, the effects of group size are frequently obscured in the theoretical literature, which often makes assumptions that are at odds with empirical findings. In particular, mechanisms are suggested as supporting large-scale cooperation when they would in fact rapidly become ineffective with increasing group size. Here we review the literature on the evolution of helping behaviours (cooperation and altruism), and frame it using a simple synthetic model that allows us to delineate how the three main components of the selection pressure on helping must vary with increasing group size. The first component is the marginal benefit of helping to group members, which determines both direct fitness benefits to the actor and indirect fitness benefits to recipients. While this is often assumed to be independent of group size, marginal benefits are in practice likely to be maximal at intermediate group sizes for many types of collective action problems, and will eventually become very small in large groups due to the law of decreasing marginal returns. The second component is the response of social partners on the past play of an actor, which underlies conditional behaviour under repeated social interactions. We argue that under realistic conditions on the transmission of information in a population, this response on past play decreases rapidly with increasing group size so that reciprocity alone (whether direct, indirect, or generalised) cannot sustain cooperation in very large groups. The final component is the relatedness between actor and recipient, which, according to the rules of inheritance, again decreases rapidly with increasing group size. These results explain why helping behaviours in very large social groups are limited to cases where the number of reproducing individuals is small, as in social insects, or where there are social institutions that can promote (possibly through sanctioning) large-scale cooperation, as in human societies. Finally, we discuss how individually devised institutions can foster the transition from small-scale to large-scale cooperative groups in human evolution.
Keywords: altruism; cooperation; cultural evolution; diminishing returns; group size; institutions; punishment; reciprocity; relatedness; sociality.
© 2016 Cambridge Philosophical Society.
Similar articles
-
Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring.Nature. 1998 Jun 11;393(6685):573-7. doi: 10.1038/31225. Nature. 1998. PMID: 9634232
-
Correlated pay-offs are key to cooperation.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150084. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0084. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016. PMID: 26729924 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How life history and demography promote or inhibit the evolution of helping behaviours.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2599-617. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0138. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010. PMID: 20679105 Free PMC article. Review.
-
First- and second-order sociality determine survival and reproduction in cooperative cichlids.Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 22;282(1819):20151971. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1971. Proc Biol Sci. 2015. PMID: 26582022 Free PMC article.
-
A simple rule for the evolution of contingent cooperation in large groups.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150099. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0099. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016. PMID: 26729938 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The evolution of mechanisms to produce phenotypic heterogeneity in microorganisms.Nat Commun. 2022 Jan 25;13(1):195. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27902-4. Nat Commun. 2022. PMID: 35078994 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal strategies and cost-benefit analysis of the [Formula: see text]-player weightlifting game.Sci Rep. 2022 May 19;12(1):8482. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12394-z. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35589925 Free PMC article.
-
Cultural group selection and human cooperation: a conceptual and empirical review.Evol Hum Sci. 2020 Feb 7;2:e2. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.2. eCollection 2020. Evol Hum Sci. 2020. PMID: 37588374 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How evolutionary behavioural sciences can help us understand behaviour in a pandemic.Evol Med Public Health. 2020 Oct 24;2020(1):264-278. doi: 10.1093/emph/eoaa038. eCollection 2020. Evol Med Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33318799 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evolution of warfare by resource raiding favours polymorphism in belligerence and bravery.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210136. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0136. Epub 2022 Apr 4. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35369745 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous