Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun 15;122(12):1913-20.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.29972. Epub 2016 Mar 15.

Genetic anticipation in BRCA1/BRCA2 families after controlling for ascertainment bias and cohort effect

Affiliations

Genetic anticipation in BRCA1/BRCA2 families after controlling for ascertainment bias and cohort effect

Rodrigo Santa Cruz Guindalini et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Genetic anticipation, the earlier onset of disease in successive generations, has been reported in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC), but little is known about its underlying mechanisms. Ascertainment bias has been suggested as a reason in previous studies. Likewise, cohort effect, which may be caused by environmental factors, can be misinterpreted as genetic anticipation.

Methods: The authors reviewed the pedigrees of 176 kindreds, segregating those with deleterious mutations in breast cancer genes 1 and 2 (BRCA1/BRCA2) who had at least 2 consecutive generations of the same cancer (breast or ovarian). By using mutation probabilities as analytical weights in weighted random-effect models, generational differences in the age at onset of breast/ovarian cancer were calculated. The analyses were further controlled for ascertainment bias by excluding probands and adjusting for birth-cohort effect in the anticipation models.

Results: The mean age at the onset of breast cancer for the probands' generation was 41.9 years, which was 6.8 years and 9.8 years earlier than the parents' and grandparents' generations, respectively. The anticipation effect for breast cancer remained significant after excluding the probands. There was a birth-cohort effect: patients who were born in 1930s and 1940s had breast cancer 5.0 years and 7.6 years earlier than patients who were born before 1920. The difference in breast cancer age of onset across generations was no longer significant after adjusting for birth-cohort effect.

Conclusions: The observed anticipation effect was driven mainly by a decrease in age of onset across birth cohorts, underscoring the need for risk-reducing interventions that target changing environmental/lifestyle factors in BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers. Cancer 2016;122:1913-20. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Keywords: ascertainment bias; breast cancer genes 1 and 2 (BRCA1/BRCA2); cohort effect; genetic anticipation; hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kremer EJ, Pritchard M, Lynch M, et al. Mapping of DNA instability at the fragile X to a trinucleotide repeat sequence p(CCG)n. Science. 1991;252:1711–4. - PubMed
    1. Ranen NG, Stine OC, Abbott MH, et al. Anticipation and instability of IT-15 (CAG)n repeats in parent-offspring pairs with Huntington disease. American journal of human genetics. 1995;57:593–602. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsilfidis C, MacKenzie AE, Mettler G, Barcelo J, Korneluk RG. Correlation between CTG trinucleotide repeat length and frequency of severe congenital myotonic dystrophy. Nature genetics. 1992;1:192–5. - PubMed
    1. Deighton C, Criswell LA, Lum RF, Silman A. Ages of onset suggestive of genetic anticipation in rheumatoid arthritis multicase sibships can be explained by observational bias. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:120–3. - PubMed
    1. Yaturu S, Bridges JF, Dhanireddy RR. Preliminary evidence of genetic anticipation in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Med Sci Monit. 2005;11:CR262–5. - PubMed

Publication types