Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Apr;119(1):129-36.
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 15.

Quantification of dose uncertainties in cumulated dose estimation compared to planned dose in prostate IMRT

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Quantification of dose uncertainties in cumulated dose estimation compared to planned dose in prostate IMRT

Mohamed Nassef et al. Radiother Oncol. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Background and purpose: In prostate IMRT, the objectives were to quantify, for the bladder and the rectum: (i) the dose difference (DD) between the planned dose (PD) and the estimated cumulated dose (ECD) by deformable image registration (DIR); (ii) the dose accumulation uncertainties (DAU).

Materials and methods: A series of 24 patients receiving 80Gy in the prostate was used to calculate the ECDpts and the DDpts. To evaluate the DAU, a numerical phantom (ph) simulating deformations of main pelvic organs was used to calculate the ECDph using the same DIR method. A reference cumulated dose (RCDph) was calculated, based on the simulated deformations. The DAUph was defined by the differences between RCDph and ECDph.

Results: For the mean dose to the bladder, the standard deviation of DDpts was 6.9Gy (18.1Gy maximum) with a DAUph of 2.7Gy. For the rectum wall, it was 2.0Gy (4.2Gy maximum) with a DAUph of 1.2Gy. Volume differences between PDpts and ECDpts, along the dose-volume histogram, ranged from -30% to +37% and -14% to +14% for the bladder and rectum, respectively. The corresponding uncertainties ranged from -23% to +7% and -4% to +7% for the bladder and rectum, respectively.

Conclusions: Large differences between planned and delivered doses to the bladder have been quantified and are higher than the uncertainties of the DIR method. For the rectum, the differences are smaller and close to the DIR uncertainties.

Keywords: Cumulative dose; Deformable image registration; IGRT; Phantom; Prostate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources