Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Apr;103(5):477-86.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.10084.

Meta-analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions

N Hyldig  1   2 , H Birke-Sorensen  3 , M Kruse  4 , C Vinter  2 , J S Joergensen  2 , J A Sorensen  1 , O Mogensen  2 , R F Lamont  2   5 , C Bille  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Meta-analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions

N Hyldig et al. Br J Surg. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Postoperative wound complications are common following surgical procedures. Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is well recognized for the management of open wounds and has been applied recently to closed surgical incisions. The evidence base to support this intervention is limited. The aim of this study was to assess whether NPWT reduces postoperative wound complications when applied to closed surgical incisions.

Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of NPWT compared with standard postoperative dressings on closed surgical incisions.

Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 1311 incisions in 1089 patients. NPWT was associated with a significant reduction in wound infection (relative risk (RR) 0·54, 95 per cent c.i. 0·33 to 0·89) and seroma formation (RR 0·48, 0·27 to 0·84) compared with standard care. The reduction in wound dehiscence was not significant. The numbers needed to treat were three (seroma), 17 (dehiscence) and 25 (infection). Methodological heterogeneity across studies led to downgrading of the quality of evidence to moderate for infection and seroma, and low for dehiscence.

Conclusion: Compared with standard postoperative dressings, NPWT significantly reduced the rate of wound infection and seroma when applied to closed surgical wounds. Heterogeneity between the included studies means that no general recommendations can be made yet.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A negative‐pressure wound therapy dressing in situ
Figure 2
Figure 2
PRISMA diagram showing the selection of articles. RCT, randomized clinical trial
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG et al Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991; 91: 152S–157S. - PubMed
    1. Haley RW, Culver DH, Morgan WM, White JW, Emori TG, Hooton TM. Identifying patients at high risk of surgical wound infection. A simple multivariate index of patient susceptibility and wound contamination. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 121: 206–215. - PubMed
    1. Leth RA, Uldbjerg N, Norgaard M, Moller JK, Thomsen RW. Obesity, diabetes, and the risk of infections diagnosed in hospital and post‐discharge infections after cesarean section: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011; 90: 501–509. - PubMed
    1. Riou JP, Cohen JR, Johnson H Jr . Factors influencing wound dehiscence. Am J Surg 1992; 163: 324–330. - PubMed
    1. Wilson JA, Clark JJ. Obesity: impediment to postsurgical wound healing. Adv Skin Wound Care 2004; 17: 426–435. - PubMed

MeSH terms