Laparoscopic Versus Laparotomic Surgical Staging for Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer: A Case-Control Study
- PMID: 26995493
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.006
Laparoscopic Versus Laparotomic Surgical Staging for Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer: A Case-Control Study
Abstract
Study objective: To evaluate the oncologic outcomes of patients with early-stage ovarian cancer (eOC) managed by laparoscopy or laparotomy in a single high-volume gynecologic cancer center.
Design: Retrospective case-control study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
Setting: Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, Rome, Italy.
Patients: Data of consecutive women with eOC undergoing comprehensive laparoscopic staging between 2007 and 2013 were matched with a cohort of patients undergoing open surgery between 2000 and 2011. Four-year survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measurements and results: Sixty women undergoing staging via laparoscopy were compared with a cohort of 120 patients undergoing open surgery. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Seventy percent of patients underwent adjuvant platinum based chemotherapy without differences between the 2 groups. Operative time (p = .01), estimated blood loss (p = .032), and median hospital stay (p = .001) were higher in patients submitted to laparotomic versus laparoscopic staging. As of October 2015, median duration of follow-up was 38 months (range, 24 -48), recurrent disease was documented in 16 patients (13.3%) in the laparotomic group and in 5 patients (8.3%) in the laparoscopic group (p = .651), without differences in the pattern of recurrence presentation. Four-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 89% and 92% in the laparoscopic group, respectively, and 81% and 91% in the laparotomic group, without any statistical significant difference between the groups (4-year PFS p = .651; 4-year OS p = .719).
Conclusion: The findings of the present study suggests that in the surgical treatment of FIGO stage I ovarian cancer, laparoscopy is associated with equivalent oncologic outcome compared with a conventional abdominal approach.
Keywords: Early ovarian cancer; Laparoscopy; Ovarian cancer.
Copyright © 2016 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic staging for apparent stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;216(1):50.e1-50.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.030. Epub 2016 Aug 25. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 27567562 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally invasive secondary cytoreduction plus HIPEC versus open surgery plus HIPEC in isolated relapse from ovarian cancer: a retrospective cohort study on perioperative outcomes.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Mar-Apr;22(3):428-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.11.008. Epub 2014 Nov 26. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25461683
-
Minimal access surgery compared to laparotomy for secondary surgical cytoreduction in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma: Perioperative and oncologic outcomes.Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Aug;146(2):263-267. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 May 17. Gynecol Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28527673
-
[Surgery in early-stage ovarian cancer: Article drafted from the French Guidelines in oncology entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY under the aegis of CNGOF and endorsed by INCa].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2019 Feb;47(2):168-179. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.12.007. Epub 2019 Jan 25. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2019. PMID: 30686727 Review. French.
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic staging compared to conventional laparoscopic staging and laparotomic staging in clinical early stage ovarian carcinoma.Curr Opin Oncol. 2022 Sep 1;34(5):490-496. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000879. Curr Opin Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35943438 Review.
Cited by
-
Laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgical treatment in apparent stage I ovarian cancer: a multi-center retrospective cohort study.World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb 22;22(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03345-1. World J Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38389046 Free PMC article.
-
Current treatment strategies for ovarian cancer in the East Asian Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group (EAGOT).J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 May;35(3):e87. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e87. Epub 2024 Apr 3. J Gynecol Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38606827 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is It the Time for Laparoscopic Management of Early-stage Ovarian Malignancies?Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2018 Jul-Sep;7(3):93-103. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_59_18. Epub 2018 Aug 23. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2018. PMID: 30254949 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: the Right Surgical Approach.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s11864-021-00919-z. Epub 2022 Feb 15. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35167007 Review.
-
Minimally-Invasive Secondary Cytoreduction in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 28;15(19):4769. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194769. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37835463 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials