Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Mar 20;6(3):e010599.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010599.

Variation in adverse drug reactions listed in product information for antidepressants and anticonvulsants, between the USA and Europe: a comparison review of paired regulatory documents

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Variation in adverse drug reactions listed in product information for antidepressants and anticonvulsants, between the USA and Europe: a comparison review of paired regulatory documents

Victoria R Cornelius et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare consistency of adverse drug reaction (ADR) data in publicly available product information documents for brand drugs, between the USA and Europe. To assess the usefulness of information for prescribers and patients.

Design: A comparison review of product information documents for antidepressants and anticonvulsants concurrently marketed by the same pharmaceutical company in the USA and Europe.

Setting: For each drug, data were extracted from the US Product Inserts and the European Summary of Product Characteristics documents between 09/2013 and 01/2015.

Participants: Individuals contributing ADR information to product information documents.

Main outcomes measures: All ADRs reported in product information sections 5 and 6 (USA), and 4·4 and 4·8 (Europe).

Results: Twelve brand drugs--24 paired documents--were included. On average, there were 77 more ADRs reported in the USA compared with in the European product information document, with a median number of 201 ADRs (range: 65-425) and 114 (range: 56-265), respectively. More product information documents in the USA reported information on the source of evidence (10 vs 5) and risk (9 vs 5) for greater than 80% of ADRs included in the document. There was negligible information included regarding duration, severity, reversibility or recurrence of ADRs. On average, only 29% of ADR terms were reported in both paired documents.

Conclusions: Product information documents contained a large number of ADRs, but lacked contextual data and information important to patients and prescribers, such as duration, severity and reversibility. The ADR profile was found to be inconsistently reported between the USA and Europe, for the same drug. Identifying, selecting, summarising and presenting multidimensional harm data should be underpinned by practical evidence-based guidelines. In order for prescribers to provide considered risk-benefit advice across competing drug therapies to patients, they need access to comprehensible and reliable ADR information.

Keywords: Summary of Product Characteristics; United States Product Inserts; adverse drug reactions; anticonvulsants; antidepressent; product infomation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of issues to address in selection and presentation of harm information from clinical studies. ADRs, adverse drug reaction; AEs, adverse event; QoL, quality of life; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SARs, serious adverse reaction; SUSARs, suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ioannidis JP. Adverse events in randomized trials: neglected, restricted, distorted, and silenced. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1737–9. 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.313 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cornelius VR, Sauzet O, Williams JE et al. . Adverse event reporting in randomised controlled trials of neuropathic pain: considerations for future practice. Pain 2013;154:213–20. 10.1016/j.pain.2012.08.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maggi CB, Griebeler IH, Dal Pizzol Tda S. Information on adverse events in randomised clinical trials assessing drug interventions published in four medical journals with high impact factors. Int J Risk Saf Med 2014;26:9–22. 10.3233/JRS-140609 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sauzet O, Williams JE, Ross J et al. . The characteristics and quality of randomized controlled trials in neuropathic pain: a descriptive study based on a systematic review. Clin J Pain 2013;29:591–9. 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31826d6251 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry- Adverse Reactions Section of Labeling for Human Prescription Drug and Biological Products—Content and Format. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformati... & http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformati... (accessed 12/2015).

Publication types

MeSH terms