Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 21;6(3):e010391.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010391.

Perceptions and impact of plain packaging of tobacco products in low and middle income countries, middle to upper income countries and low-income settings in high-income countries: a systematic review of the literature

Nicole Hughes  1 , Monika Arora  2 , Nathan Grills  1
Affiliations

Perceptions and impact of plain packaging of tobacco products in low and middle income countries, middle to upper income countries and low-income settings in high-income countries: a systematic review of the literature

Nicole Hughes et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To review the current literature around the potential impact, effectiveness and perceptions of plain packaging in low income settings.

Method: A systematic review of the literature.

Data sources: 9 databases (PubMed, Global Health, Social Policy and Practice, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), CINAHL, PsycINFO, British Library for Development Studies (BLDS), Global Health Library and Scopus) were searched. The terms used for searching combined terms for smoking and tobacco use with terms for plain packaging.

Study selection: Studies investigating the impact of plain packaging on the determinants of tobacco use, such as smoking behaviour, appeal, prominence, effectiveness of health warnings, response to plain packs, attitudes towards quitting or likelihood of smoking in low-income settings, were identified. Studies must have been published in English and be original research of any level of rigour.

Data extraction: Two independent reviewers assessed studies for inclusion and extracted data.

Data synthesis: The results were synthesised qualitatively, with themes grouped under four key headings: appeal and attractiveness; salience of health warnings and perceptions of harm; enjoyment and perceived taste ratings; and perceptions of the impact on tobacco usage behaviour.

Results: This review has identified four articles that met the inclusion criteria. Studies identified that tobacco products in plain packaging had less appeal than in branded packaging in low-income settings.

Conclusions: This review indicates that plain packaging appears to be successful in reducing appeal of smoking and packets, and supports the call for plain packaging to be widely implemented in conjunction with other tobacco control policies. However, there are considerable gaps in the amount of research conducted outside high-income countries.

Keywords: PUBLIC HEALTH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process of article selection.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2008: The MPOWER package. Geneva: WHO, 2008.
    1. Doll R, Hill AB. Lung Cancer and Other Causes of Death in Relation to Smoking: a Second Report on the Mortality of British Doctors. BMJ 1956;10:1071–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Australian Government Department of Health. National Drug Strategy Household Survey detailed report 2013 [10 Aug 2015]. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/tobacco-kff
    1. World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, country profile India. 2015.
    1. Eriksen M, Mackay J, Ross H. The tobacco atlas. 4th edn Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2012.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources