Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;9(4):e002356.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002356.

Transcatheter Replacement of Stenotic Aortic Valve Normalizes Cardiac-Coronary Interaction by Restoration of Systolic Coronary Flow Dynamics as Assessed by Wave Intensity Analysis

Affiliations

Transcatheter Replacement of Stenotic Aortic Valve Normalizes Cardiac-Coronary Interaction by Restoration of Systolic Coronary Flow Dynamics as Assessed by Wave Intensity Analysis

M Cristina Rolandi et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Aortic valve stenosis (AS) can cause angina despite unobstructed coronary arteries, which may be related to increased compression of the intramural microcirculation, especially at the subendocardium. We assessed coronary wave intensity and phasic flow velocity patterns to unravel changes in cardiac-coronary interaction because of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Methods and results: Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity were measured at rest and maximal hyperemia in undiseased vessels in 15 patients with AS before and after TAVI and in 12 control patients. Coronary flow reserve, systolic and diastolic velocity time integrals, and the energies of forward (aorta-originating) and backward (microcirculatory-originating) coronary waves were determined. Coronary flow reserve was 2.8±0.2 (mean±SEM) in control and 1.8±0.1 in AS (P<0.005) and was not restored by TAVI. Compared with control, the resting backward expansion wave was 45% higher in AS. The peak of the systolic forward compression wave was delayed in AS, consistent with a delayed peak aortic pressure, which was partially restored after TAVI. The energy of forward waves doubled after TAVI, whereas the backward expansion wave increased by >30%. The increase in forward compression wave with TAVI was related to an increase in systolic velocity time integral. AS or TAVI did not alter diastolic velocity time integral.

Conclusions: Reduced coronary forward wave energy and systolic velocity time integral imply a compromised systolic flow velocity with AS that is restored after TAVI, suggesting an acute relief of excess compression in systole that likely benefits subendocardial perfusion. Vasodilation is observed to be a major determinant of backward waves.

Keywords: aortic valve stenosis; cardiac–coronary interaction; coronary flow; transcatheter aortic valve implantation; wave intensity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources