Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 May;18(5):45.
doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0717-x.

Choosing Between MRI and CT Imaging in the Adult with Congenital Heart Disease

Affiliations
Review

Choosing Between MRI and CT Imaging in the Adult with Congenital Heart Disease

Crystal Bonnichsen et al. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 May.

Abstract

Improvements in the outcomes of surgical and catheter-based interventions and medical therapy have led to a growing population of adult patients with congenital heart disease. Adult patients with previously undiagnosed congenital heart disease or those previously palliated or repaired may have challenging echocardiographic examinations. Understanding the distinct anatomic and hemodynamic features of the congenital anomaly and quantifying ventricular function and valvular dysfunction plays an important role in the management of these patients. Rapid advances in imaging technology with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) allow for improved visualization of complex cardiac anatomy in the evaluation of this unique patient population. Although echocardiography remains the most widely used imaging tool to evaluate congenital heart disease, alternative and, at times, complimentary imaging modalities should be considered. When caring for adults with congenital heart disease, it is important to choose the proper imaging study that can answer the clinical question with the highest quality images, lowest risk to the patient, and in a cost-efficient manner.

Keywords: Cardiac imaging; Computed tomography angiography; Congenital heart disease; Magnetic resonance imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Mar 17;43(6):1068-74 - PubMed
    1. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009 Jan;47(1):79-90 - PubMed
    1. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012 Jan;33(1):59-67 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1998 Dec 22-29;98(25):2873-82 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 2005 Mar 15;95(6):779-82 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources