Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun 17;11(6):1552-1560.
doi: 10.1021/acschembio.6b00083. Epub 2016 Mar 30.

Highly Dynamic Interactions Maintain Kinetic Stability of the ClpXP Protease During the ATP-Fueled Mechanical Cycle

Affiliations

Highly Dynamic Interactions Maintain Kinetic Stability of the ClpXP Protease During the ATP-Fueled Mechanical Cycle

Alvaro J Amor et al. ACS Chem Biol. .

Abstract

The ClpXP protease assembles in a reaction in which an ATP-bound ring hexamer of ClpX binds to one or both heptameric rings of the ClpP peptidase. Contacts between ClpX IGF-loops and clefts on a ClpP ring stabilize the complex. How ClpXP stability is maintained during the ATP-hydrolysis cycle that powers mechanical unfolding and translocation of protein substrates is poorly understood. Here, we use a real-time kinetic assay to monitor the effects of nucleotides on the assembly and disassembly of ClpXP. When ATP is present, complexes containing single-chain ClpX assemble via an intermediate and remain intact until transferred into buffers containing ADP or no nucleotides. ATP binding to high-affinity subunits of the ClpX hexamer prevents rapid dissociation, but additional subunits must be occupied to promote assembly. Small-molecule acyldepsipeptides, which compete with the IGF loops of ClpX for ClpP-cleft binding, cause exceptionally rapid dissociation of otherwise stable ClpXP complexes, suggesting that the IGF-loop interactions with ClpP must be highly dynamic. Our results indicate that the ClpX hexamer spends almost no time in an ATP-free state during the ATPase cycle, allowing highly processive degradation of protein substrates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The ClpXP protease. a) Side view of ClpXP degrading a substrate (green). A ClpX hexamer (blue) recognizes, unfolds, and translocates protein substrates into the degradation chamber of ClpP (dark orange), which consists of two heptameric rings. ClpXP is principally stabilized by interactions between the IGF loops of ClpX and hydrophobic clefts on each ClpP ring. b) Axial view of a ClpX homohexameric ring and a ClpP homoheptameric ring, highlighting the interaction elements. c) Chemical structure of ADEP-2B., The portion thought to mimic binding of an IGF tripeptide is colored purple. d) sc6ClpXΔN-bio is a single-chain pseudohexamer in which the ClpXΔN subunits are linked by six-residue tethers. The protein contains an N-terminal FLAG tag and a C-terminal sequence consisting of a biotin acceptor peptide (BAP), a cleavage site for Tobacco Etch Virus protease (TEV), and six histidines (H6).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Association of ClpP with sc6ClpXΔN-bio assayed by BLI. a) A streptavidin-coated BLI biosensor was incubated sequentially with buffer, buffer plus 20 nM sc6ClpXΔN-bio, buffer plus 2 mM ATP, buffer plus 200 nM ClpP and 2 mM ATP, and buffer plus 2 mM ATP. b) BLI trajectories showing that ClpP binding to sc6ClpXΔN-bio occurs with similar kinetics in the presence of ATP or ATPγS (2 mM each). Binding was not observed with 2 mM ADP or no nucleotide. Individual trajectories are offset to allow comparisons. c) Residuals of single-exponential and/or double-exponential fits for association trajectories obtained using ClpP concentrations of 0.5 or 500 nM. d) For ClpP concentrations of 200 nM or less, rate constants from single-exponential fits of ClpP association trajectories (kobs) varied linearly with ClpP, with a slope corresponding to the second-order association rate constant. e) Variation of the rate constants from double-exponential fits for ClpP concentrations of 500 nM or higher. The curves are fits to a hyperbolic equation. For kobs-1 (amplitude ~70%), the maximal rate was 22 ± 7 s−1 with a half-maximal concentration of ~35 μM ClpP heptamer. For kobs-2 (amplitude ~30%), the maximal rate was 0.54 ± 0.2 s−1 with a half-maximal concentration of ~2 μM ClpP heptamer.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Nucleotide dependence of ClpP association. a) Graphs showing normalized sc6ClpXΔN-bio ATP-hydrolysis activity and normalized ClpP association rate constants (obtained using 200 nM ClpP) as a function of ATP concentration. The curves are fits to a Hill equation (Y = [ATP]n/(Kappn + [ATP]n). For ATP hydrolysis, the fitted values of Kapp and n were 42 ± 3 μM and 2.4 ± 0.3, respectively. For assembly, these fitted values were 100 ± 2 μM and 2.1 ± 0.06, respectively. Maximal fitted values prior to normalization were 73 ± 1 min−1 enz−1 for ATP hydrolysis and 0.138 ± 0.001 s−1 for kobs. b) Variation of kobs for 200 nM ClpP association with the fraction of ATP in mixtures with ADP (2 mM total nucleotide).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Dissociation and equilibrium stability of ClpXP complexes. a) Complexes were assembled with sc6ClpXΔN-bio bound to the biosensor, 200 nM ClpP, and 2 mM ATP. At time zero, the biosensor was moved into ClpP-free buffer containing 2 mM ADP, 2 mM ATP, or 2 mM ATPγS. The trajectories have been offset vertically, but all start at the same BLI value ± 5%. b) The same experiment as shown in panel A, except ClpXP complexes were assembled in the presence of 2 mM ATPγS. c) Dissociation kinetics after transfer into buffer without nucleotide for ClpP complexes assembled with ATPase-active sc6ClpXΔN-bio and ATP (bottom curve), ATPase-active sc6ClpXΔN-bio and ATPγS (middle curve) or a ATP-hydrolysis defective REEREE sc6ClpXΔN-bio variant and ATP (top curve). d) Complexes were assembled with ATP as in panel a and then transferred into ClpP-free buffer containing different concentrations of ATP. Dissociation rate constants were calculated from single-exponential fits and plotted as a function of the ATP concentration. The line is a fit to the Hill equation. e) Half-lives of ClpXP complexes assembled in ATP following transfer into buffer containing 100% ADP (2 mM) or 87.5% ADP (1.75 mM ADP; 0.25 mM ATP). (f) BLI trajectories showing that ClpXP complexes are stable for long periods in ClpP-free buffer containing 2 mM ATP, 2 mM ATP and unbiotinylated sc6ClpXΔN (1 μM), or 2 mM ATP and GFP-ssrA (20 μM). g) Equilibrium BLI response for sc6ClpXΔN-bio binding as a function of total ClpP concentration. The fitted curve is a hyperbolic equation with half-maximal binding at a total ClpP concentration of 160 ± 75 pM.
Figure 5
Figure 5
ADEP effects. a) BLI trajectories following transfer of ATP-stabilized ClpXP into ClpP-free buffer containing 2 mM ATP without or with 50 μM ADEP-2B. b) BLI trajectories following transfer of ATP-stabilized ClpXP into ClpP-free buffer containing 200 nM ADEP-2B and 2 mM ATP or ATPγS. c) ADEP-2B stimulation of dissociation. ATP-stabilized ClpXP was transferred into ClpP-free buffer containing 2 mM ATP and different ADEP-2B concentrations, and dissociation rate constants were determined by single-exponential fits. The line is a hyperbolic fit (R2 = 0.994) with values of 2.0 ± 0.13 s−1 for the maximum rate and 50 ± 7 μM for half-maximal stimulation. Sigmoidal equations for mechanisms involving two ADEPs (α2/(1+2α+α2); α = [ADEP]/Kμ; R2 = 0.971) or three ADEPs (α3/(1+3α+3α23); R2 = 0.958) gave poorer fits. d) (top) ADEP-2B stimulation of decapeptide cleavage of 25 nM ClpP. The line is a hyperbolic fit (R2 = 0.995) with half-maximal inhibition at a total concentration of 240 ± 26 nM. (bottom) ADEP-2B inhibition of association of 200 nM ClpP. The line is a hyperbolic fit (R2 = 0.981) with half-maximal inhibition at a total concentration of 167 ± 20 nM.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Models for small-molecule control of complex stability. a) ADEP binding to an empty ClpP cleft allosterically stabilizes a conformation from which ClpX rapidly dissociates. For simplicity, only a subset of IGF loops in ClpX and clefts in each ring of ClpP are shown. b) ADEP binding to a ClpP cleft transiently unoccupied by an IGF loop prevents re-docking and stimulates dissociation. c) ATP binding to the ClpX hexamer stabilizes a conformation of the IGF loops that binds the ClpP clefts more efficiently. d) ATP binding to the ClpX hexamer positions the IGF loops to interact optimally with ClpP.

References

    1. Baker TA, Sauer RT. ClpXP, an ATP-powered unfolding and proteindegradation machine. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012;1823:15–28. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grimaud R, Kessel M, Beuron F, Steven AC, Maurizi MR. Enzymatic and structural similarities between the Escherichia coli ATP-dependent proteases, ClpXP and ClpAP. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:12476–12481. - PubMed
    1. Jones JM, Welty DJ, Nakai H. Versatile action of Escherichia coli ClpXP as protease or molecular chaperone for bacteriophage Mu transposition. J. Biol. Chem. 1988;273:459–465. - PubMed
    1. Burton RE, Baker TA, Sauer RT. Energy-dependent degradation: Linkage between ClpXP-catalyzed nucleotide hydrolysis and protein-substrate processing. Protein Sci. 2003;12:893–902. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joshi SA, Hersch GL, Baker TA, Sauer RT. Communication between ClpX and ClpP during substrate processing and degradation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004;11:404–411. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources