Female Reproductive Disorders, Diseases, and Costs of Exposure to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in the European Union
- PMID: 27003299
- PMCID: PMC4880176
- DOI: 10.1210/jc.2015-2873
Female Reproductive Disorders, Diseases, and Costs of Exposure to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in the European Union
Abstract
Context: A growing body of evidence suggests that endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) contribute to female reproductive disorders.
Objective: To calculate the associated combined health care and economic costs attributable to specific EDC exposures within the European Union (EU).
Design: An expert panel evaluated evidence for probability of causation using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change weight-of-evidence characterization. Exposure-response relationships and reference levels were evaluated, and biomarker data were organized from carefully identified studies from the peer-reviewed literature to represent European exposure and approximate burden of disease as it occurred in 2010. Cost-of-illness estimation used multiple peer-reviewed sources.
Setting, patients and participants and intervention: Cost estimation was carried out from a societal perspective, ie, including direct costs (eg, treatment costs) and indirect costs such as productivity loss.
Results: The most robust EDC-related data for female reproductive disorders exist for 1) diphenyldichloroethene-attributable fibroids and 2) phthalate-attributable endometriosis in Europe. In both cases, the strength of epidemiological evidence was rated as low and the toxicological evidence as moderate, with an assigned probability of causation of 20%–39%. Across the EU, attributable cases were estimated to be 56 700 and 145 000 women, respectively, with total combined economic and health care costs potentially reaching €163 million and €1.25 billion.
Conclusions: EDCs (diphenyldichloroethene and phthalates) may contribute substantially to the most common reproductive disorders in women, endometriosis and fibroids, costing nearly €1.5 billion annually. These estimates represent only EDCs for which there were sufficient epidemiologic studies and those with the highest probability of causation. These public health costs should be considered as the EU contemplates regulatory action on EDCs.
Comment in
-
Letter to the Editor: Phthalates and Endometriosis.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Nov;101(11):L108-L109. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-3116. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016. PMID: 27809715 No abstract available.
-
Response to the Letter by G. M. H. Swaen and R. Otter.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Nov;101(11):L110-L111. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-3294. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016. PMID: 27809718 No abstract available.
References
-
- Buck Louis G, Cooney M. Effects of environmental contaminants on ovarian function and fertility. In: Gonzalez-Bulnes A, ed. Novel Concepts in Ovarian Endocrinology. Kerala, India: Transworld Research Network; 2007.
-
- Buck Louis G, Cooney MA, Peterson CM. Ovarian dysgenesis syndrome. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2011;2:25–35.
-
- Skakkebaek NE, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Main KM. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:972–978. - PubMed
-
- Herbst AL, Green TH, Jr, Ulfelder H. Primary carcinoma of the vagina. An analysis of 68 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1970;106:210–218. - PubMed
-
- Herbst AL, Scully RE. Adenocarcinoma of the vagina in adolescence. A report of 7 cases including 6 clear-cell carcinomas (so-called mesonephromas). Cancer. 1970;25:745–757. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
