Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2016 Aug 15;72(5):513-20.
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000998.

Fracture Prediction With Modified-FRAX in Older HIV-Infected and Uninfected Men

Affiliations
Observational Study

Fracture Prediction With Modified-FRAX in Older HIV-Infected and Uninfected Men

Michael T Yin et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. .

Abstract

Background: FRAX is a validated, computer-based clinical fracture risk calculator that estimates the 10-year risk of major osteoporotic (clinical spine, forearm, hip, or shoulder) fracture, and hip fracture alone. It is widely used for decision making in fracture prevention, but it may underestimate the risk in HIV-infected individuals. Some experts recommend considering HIV as a cause of secondary osteoporosis when calculating FRAX in HIV-infected individuals.

Methods: From the Veterans Aging Cohort Study Virtual Cohort, we included 24,451 HIV-infected and uninfected men aged 50-70 years with complete data in the year 2000 to approximate all but 2 factors (ie, history of secondary osteoporosis and parental hip fracture) for modified-FRAX calculation without bone density and 10-year observational data for incident fragility fracture. The accuracy of the modified-FRAX calculation was compared by the observed/estimated (O/E) ratios of fracture by HIV status.

Results: The accuracy of modified-FRAX was less for HIV-infected [O/E = 1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45 to 1.81] than uninfected men (O/E = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.40), but improved when HIV was included as a cause of secondary osteoporosis (O/E = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.34). However, only 3%-6% of men with incident fractures were correctly identified by the modified-FRAX using accepted FRAX thresholds for pharmacologic therapy.

Conclusions: Modified-FRAX underestimated the fracture rates more in older HIV-infected than in otherwise similar uninfected men. The accuracy improved when HIV was included as a cause of secondary osteoporosis, but it still performed poorly for case finding. Further studies are necessary to determine how to use FRAX or define an HIV-specific index to risk stratify for screening and treatment in older HIV-infected individuals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Observed and modified-FRAX estimated rates of fracture by HIV status
Figure 2
Figure 2. Accuracy of modified-FRAX in HIV-infected men
Each panel shows a plot of the observed probability for major osteoporotic facture (error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval) versus the mean estimated fracture probability for the subgroup divided by the decile of estimated probability. The dotted line represents a perfectly calibrated model and solid line represent the best fit for HIV-uninfected men (a), HIV-infected men (b), and HIV-infected men when ‘secondary osteoporosis’ is entered into the FRAX calculation (The p values indicate the goodness of fit using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (p<0.05 indicates a significant difference from the perfectly calibrated model).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Young B, Dao CN, Buchacz K, Baker R, Brooks JT. Increased rates of bone fracture among HIV-infected persons in the HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS) compared with the US general population, 2000-2006. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Apr 15;52(8):1061–1068. - PubMed
    1. Hansen AB, Gerstoft J, Kronborg G, et al. Incidence of low- and high-energy fractures in persons with and without HIV-infection: a Danish population-based cohort study. Aids. Nov 16. 2011 - PubMed
    1. Womack JA, Goulet JL, Gibert C, et al. Increased risk of fragility fractures among HIV infected compared to uninfected male veterans. PloS one. 2011;6(2):e17217. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aberg JA, Gallant JE, Ghanem KG, et al. Primary care guidelines for the management of persons infected with HIV: 2013 update by the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2014 Jan;58(1):1–10. - PubMed
    1. European AIDS Clinical Society Treatment Guidelines. 2015; Version 8.0. 2015 http://www.eacsociety.org/guidelines/eacs-guidelines/eacs-guidelines.html.

Publication types