Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Mar 23:6:23425.
doi: 10.1038/srep23425.

The Efficacy and Safety of Knotless Barbed Sutures in the Surgical Field: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The Efficacy and Safety of Knotless Barbed Sutures in the Surgical Field: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Yifei Lin et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The knotless barbed suture is an innovative type of suture that can accelerate the placement of sutures and eliminate knot tying. However, the outcomes of previous studies are still confounding. This study reviewed the application of different types of barbed sutures in different surgeries. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) addressing the application of barbed sutures up to Feb. 2015. Two reviewers independently screened the literature and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis was performed. Seventeen RCTs (low to moderate risk of bias) involving 1992 patients were included. Compared with conventional sutures, the barbed suture could reduce suture time (SMD=-0.95, 95%CI -1.43 to -0.46, P = 0.0001) and the operative time (SMD=-0.28, 95%CI -0.46 to -0.10, P = 0.003), not significantly increase the estimated blood loss (SMD=-0.09, 95%CI -0.52 to 0.35, P = 0.70), but could lead to more postoperative complications (OR = 1.43, 95%CI 1.05 to 1.96, P = 0.03), These results varied in subgroups. Thus, barbed sutures are effective in reducing the suture and operative time, but the safety evidences are still not sufficient. It need be evaluated based on special surgeries and suture types before put into clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the detailed selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2. A forest plot of suturing time with or without barbed suture.
Figure 3
Figure 3. A forest plot of operative time with or without barbed suture.
Figure 4
Figure 4. A forest plot of estimated blood loss with or without barbed suture.
Figure 5
Figure 5. A forest plot of postoperative complications with or without barbed suture.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Paul M. D. Bidirectional barbed sutures for wound closure: evolution and applications. J Am Col Certif Wound Spec 1, 51–57, doi: 10.1016/j.jcws.2009.01.002 (2009). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ruff G. L. The history of barbed sutures. Aesthet Surg J 33, 12s–16s, doi: 10.1177/1090820x13498505 (2013). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iavazzo C., Mamais I. & Gkegkes I. D. The Role of Knotless Barbed Suture in Gynecologic Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surg Innov, doi: 10.1177/1553350614554235 (2014). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murtha A. P. et al.. Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture. Plast Reconstr Surg 117, 1769–1780, doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000209971.08264.b0 (2006). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alessandri F., Remorgida V., Venturini P. L. & Ferrero S. Unidirectional barbed suture versus continuous suture with intracorporeal knots in laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17, 725–729, doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.06.007 (2010). - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms