Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2016 May;47(5):1265-70.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011331. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

Arterial Tortuosity: An Imaging Biomarker of Childhood Stroke Pathogenesis?

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Arterial Tortuosity: An Imaging Biomarker of Childhood Stroke Pathogenesis?

Felix Wei et al. Stroke. 2016 May.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Arteriopathy is the leading cause of childhood arterial ischemic stroke. Mechanisms are poorly understood but may include inherent abnormalities of arterial structure. Extracranial dissection is associated with connective tissue disorders in adult stroke. Focal cerebral arteriopathy is a common syndrome where pathophysiology is unknown but may include intracranial dissection or transient cerebral arteriopathy. We aimed to quantify cerebral arterial tortuosity in childhood arterial ischemic stroke, hypothesizing increased tortuosity in dissection.

Methods: Children (1 month to 18 years) with arterial ischemic stroke were recruited within the Vascular Effects of Infection in Pediatric Stroke (VIPS) study with controls from the Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program. Objective, multi-investigator review defined diagnostic categories. A validated imaging software method calculated the mean arterial tortuosity of the major cerebral arteries using 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiographic source images. Tortuosity of unaffected vessels was compared between children with dissection, transient cerebral arteriopathy, meningitis, moyamoya, cardioembolic strokes, and controls (ANOVA and post hoc Tukey). Trauma-related versus spontaneous dissection was compared (Student t test).

Results: One hundred fifteen children were studied (median, 6.8 years; 43% women). Age and sex were similar across groups. Tortuosity means and variances were consistent with validation studies. Tortuosity in controls (1.346±0.074; n=15) was comparable with moyamoya (1.324±0.038; n=15; P=0.998), meningitis (1.348±0.052; n=11; P=0.989), and cardioembolic (1.379±0.056; n=27; P=0.190) cases. Tortuosity was higher in both extracranial dissection (1.404±0.084; n=22; P=0.021) and transient cerebral arteriopathy (1.390±0.040; n=27; P=0.001) children. Tortuosity was not different between traumatic versus spontaneous dissections (P=0.70).

Conclusions: In children with dissection and transient cerebral arteriopathy, cerebral arteries demonstrate increased tortuosity. Quantified arterial tortuosity may represent a clinically relevant imaging biomarker of vascular biology in pediatric stroke.

Keywords: arterial tortuosity; child; dissection; magnetic resonance angiography; pediatric stroke; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Tortuosity Measurement. The distance factor metric was calculated to quanitfy relative tortuosity. Dashed arrows represent Euclidian distances (d) to local points along artery path length (L). Distance Factor Metric (DFM) = L/d. Using a bifurcation point as the definite start, an iteration is performed through every voxel along path calculating a local DFM until the endpoint is reached.
Figure 2
Figure 2
MRA tortuosity measures. Representative examples from across the range of tortuosities calculated are demonstrated. Original clinical maximum intensity projection (MIP) of time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiogram (MRA) images (top row) and their corresponding reconstructed centerline skeletons (bottom row) depict the bottom (1.237), mean (1.460) and top (1.608) range tortuosity scores.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Arterial tortuosity by location. Box plots for tortuosity scores across the entire sample are demonstarted for each major artery measured. Tortuosity was symmetrical for paired arteries, greatest in the internal carotids, and lowest in the basilar artery. ICA, internal carotid artery; M1, first segment of middle cerebral artery; L, left; R, right.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of age and gender on arterial tortuosity. A scatter lot depicts mean tortuosity scores for all subjects across the full age range with seperation of male and female subjects. No association was demonstrated with age or sex.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Tortuosity by disease. The normal range of arterial tortuosity in children is depicted by the controls (left box plot, n=15) with the 5th and 95th percentiles marked with the shaded box. Dissection (n=22) and TCA (n=25) groups demonstrated abnormally elevated tortuosity and increased variance of tortuosity scores. No difference was found between traumatic (n=9) and spontaneous (n=13) dissection.

References

    1. Mackay MT, Wiznitzer M, Benedict SL, Lee KJ, deVeber GA, Ganesan V. Arterial ischemic stroke risk factors: the international pediatric stroke study. Ann Neurol. 2011;69:130–140. - PubMed
    1. Fullerton HJ, Wu YW, Sidney S, Johnston SC. Risk of recurrent childhood arterial ischemic stroke in a population-based cohort: the importance of cerebrovascular imaging. Pediatrics. 2007;119:495–501. - PubMed
    1. Amlie-Lefond C, Bernard TJ, Sebire G, Friedman NR, Heyer GL, Lerner NB, et al. Predictors of cerebral arteriopathy in children with arterial ischemic stroke: results of the International Pediatric Stroke Study. Circulation. 2009;119:1417–1423. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dlamini N, Freeman JL, Mackay MT, Hawkins C, Shroff M, Fullerton HJ, et al. Intracranial dissection mimicking transient cerebral arteriopathy in childhood arterial ischemic stroke. J Child Neurol. 2011;26:1203–1206. - PubMed
    1. Saba L, Argiolas GM, Sumer S, Siotto P, Raz E, Sanfilippo R, et al. Association between internal carotid artery dissection and arterial tortuosity. Neuroradiology. 2015;57:149–153. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts