Outcome and periprocedural time management in referred versus directly admitted stroke patients treated with thrombectomy
- PMID: 27006695
- PMCID: PMC4784249
- DOI: 10.1177/1756285615617081
Outcome and periprocedural time management in referred versus directly admitted stroke patients treated with thrombectomy
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to outcome and periprocedural time management in referred versus directly admitted stroke patients treated with thrombectomy.Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020 Jul 17;13:1756286420942633. doi: 10.1177/1756286420942633. eCollection 2020. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020. PMID: 32733603 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: After thrombectomy has shown to be effective in acute stroke patients with large vessel occlusion, the potential benefit of secondary referral for such an intervention needs to be validated.
Aims: We aimed to compare consecutive stoke patients directly admitted and treated with thrombectomy at a neurointerventional centre with patients secondarily referred for such a procedure from hospitals with a stroke unit.
Methods: Periprocedure times and mortality in 300 patients primarily treated in eight neurointerventional centres were compared with 343 patients referred from nine other hospitals in a prospective multicentre study of a German neurovascular network. Data on functional outcome at 3 months was available in 430 (76.4%) patients.
Results: In-hospital mortality (14.8% versus 11.7%, p = 0.26) and 3 months mortality (21.9% versus 24.1%, p = 0.53) were not statistically different in both patient groups despite a significant shorter symptom to groin puncture time in directly admitted patients, which was mainly caused by a longer interfacility transfer time. We found a nonsignificant trend for better functional outcome at 3 months in directly admitted patients (modified Rankin Scale 0-2, 44.0% versus 35.7%, p = 0.08).
Conclusions: Our results show that a drip-and-ship thrombectomy concept can be effectively organized in a metropolitan stroke network. Every effort should be made to speed up the emergency interfacility transfer to a neurointerventional centre in stroke patients eligible for thrombectomy after initial brain imaging.
Keywords: functional outcome; ischemic stroke; mortality; periprocedural times; referral status; thrombectomy.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Abilleira S., Cardona P., Ribo M., Millán M., Obach V., Roquer J., et al. (2014) Outcomes of a contemporary cohort of 536 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular therapy. Stroke 45: 1046–1052. - PubMed
-
- Berkhemer O., Fransen P., Beumer D., van den Berg L., Lingsma H., Yoo A., et al. (2015) A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372: 11–20. - PubMed
-
- Campbell B., Mitchell P., Kleinig T., Dewey H., Churilov L., Yassi N., et al. (2015) Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 372: 1009–1018. - PubMed
-
- Eyding J., Weimar C., Brassel F., Kitzrow M., Krogias C., Rudel G., et al. (2012) The ‘Neurovascular Net Ruhr’. Concept and implementation of a transregional network to optimize neurovascular treatment of acute stroke patients in the Ruhr district. Akt Neurol 39: 404–411.
-
- Furlan A. (2015) Endovascular therapy for stroke – it’s about time. N Engl J Med 372: 2347–2349. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources