Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Jun 1;152(6):676-82.
doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0270.

The Role of Color and Morphologic Characteristics in Dermoscopic Diagnosis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The Role of Color and Morphologic Characteristics in Dermoscopic Diagnosis

Shirin Bajaj et al. JAMA Dermatol. .

Abstract

Importance: Both colors and structures are considered important in the dermoscopic evaluation of skin lesions but their relative significance is unknown.

Objective: To determine if diagnostic accuracy for common skin lesions differs between gray-scale and color dermoscopic images.

Design, setting, and participants: A convenience sample of 40 skin lesions (8 nevi, 8 seborrheic keratoses, 7 basal cell carcinomas, 7 melanomas, 4 hemangiomas, 4 dermatofibromas, 2 squamous cell carcinomas [SCCs]) was selected and shown to attendees of a dermoscopy course (2014 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center dermoscopy course). Twenty lesions were shown only once, either in gray-scale (n = 10) or color (n = 10) (nonpaired). Twenty lesions were shown twice, once in gray-scale (n = 20) and once in color (n = 20) (paired). Participants provided their diagnosis and confidence level for each of the 60 images. Of the 261 attendees, 158 participated (60.5%) in the study. Most were attending physicians (n = 76 [48.1%]). Most participants were practicing or training in dermatology (n = 144 [91.1%]). The median (interquartile range) experience evaluating skin lesions and using dermoscopy of participants was 6 (13.5) and 2 (4.0) years, respectively.

Main outcomes and measures: Diagnostic accuracy and confidence level of participants evaluating gray-scale and color images. Two separate analyses were performed: (1) an unpaired evaluation comparing gray-scale and color images shown either once or for the first time, and (2) a paired evaluation comparing pairs of gray-scale and color images of the same lesion.

Results: In univariate analysis of unpaired images, color images were less likely to be diagnosed correctly compared with gray-scale images (odds ratio [OR], 0.8; P < .001). Using gray-scale images as the reference, multivariate analyses of both unpaired and paired images found no association between correct lesion diagnosis and use of color images (OR, 1.0; P = .99, and OR, 1.2; P = .82, respectively). Stratified analysis of paired images using a color by diagnosis interaction term showed that participants were more likely to make a correct diagnosis of SCC and hemangioma in color (P < .001 for both comparisons) and dermatofibroma in gray-scale (P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: Morphologic characteristics (ie, structures and patterns), not color, provide the primary diagnostic clue in dermoscopy. Use of gray-scale images may improve teaching of dermoscopy to novices by emphasizing the evaluation of morphology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Plot of Predicted Marginal Probabilities of Correct Response for Gray-Scale and Color Image Assessments
A, Unpaired analysis. B, Paired analysis. A color image of squamous cell carcinoma was not included in unpaired image set; thus, there is no corresponding marginal probability of correct response for comparison to the gray-scale image. aSignificantly higher or lower scores for color image assessment, in which P < .001.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Examples From Paired Color and Gray-Scale Dermoscopic Images
A and B, Multicolored dermatofibroma; 92.4%of participants correctly diagnosed it in gray-scale compared with 56.9%in color (P < .001). The most common incorrect answer for the color image was melanoma. C and D, the central white lines in this dermatofibroma are more conspicuous in gray-scale in which nearly double the participants were able to render a correct diagnosis (6.5%vs 15.0%, P = .03). E and F, The presence of a blue-white veil in this seborrheic keratosis likely led 44.1%of participants to incorrectly diagnose this as a melanoma. In gray-scale, this lesion was correctly diagnosed by 69.9%of participants (P = .01). G and H, Melanoma in which a nearly equal percentage of participants made the correct diagnosis in both images (85.5%vs. 86.8%, respectively, P = .74).

References

    1. Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol. 2002;3(3):159–165. - PubMed
    1. Bafounta ML, Beauchet A, Aegerter P, Saiag P. Is dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) useful for the diagnosis of melanoma? results of a meta-analysis using techniques adapted to the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137(10):1343–1350. - PubMed
    1. Vestergaard ME, Macaskill P, Holt PE, Menzies SW. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159(3):669–676. - PubMed
    1. Blum A, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Luedtke H, et al. Value of the clinical history for different users of dermoscopy compared with results of digital image analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2004;18(6):665–669. - PubMed
    1. Marghoob AA, Scope A. The complexity of diagnosing melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129(1):11–13. - PubMed

Publication types