Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;45(5):20150407.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150407. Epub 2016 Mar 23.

The value of thyroid shielding in intraoral radiography

Affiliations

The value of thyroid shielding in intraoral radiography

Reinier C Hoogeveen et al. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the utility of the application of a thyroid shield in intraoral radiography when using rectangular collimation.

Methods: Experimental data were obtained by measuring the absorbed dose at the position of the thyroid gland in a RANDO(®) (The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY) male phantom with a dosemeter. Four protocols were tested: round collimation and rectangular collimation, both with and without thyroid shield. Five exposure positions were deployed: upper incisor (Isup), upper canine (Csup), upper premolar (Psup), upper molar (Msup) and posterior bitewing (BW). Exposures were made with 70 kV and 7 mA and were repeated 10 times. The exposure times were as recommended for the exposure positions for the respective collimator type by the manufacturer for digital imaging. The data were statistically analyzed with a three-way ANOVA test. Significance was set at p < 0.01.

Results: The ANOVA test revealed that the differences between mean doses of all protocols and geometries were statistically significant, p < 0.001. For the Isup, thyroid dose levels were comparable with both collimators at a level indicating primary beam exposure. Thyroid shield reduced this dose with circa 75%. For the Csup position, round collimation also revealed primary beam exposure, and thyroid shield yield was 70%. In Csup with rectangular collimation, the thyroid dose was reduced with a factor 4 compared with round collimation and thyroid shield yielded an additional 42% dose reduction. The thyroid dose levels for the Csup, Psup, Msup and BW exposures were lower with rectangular collimation without thyroid shield than with round collimation with thyroid shield. With rectangular collimation, the thyroid shield in Psup, Msup and BW reduced the dose 10% or less, where dose levels were already low, implying no clinical significance.

Conclusions: For the exposures in the upper anterior region, thyroid shield results in an important dose reduction for the thyroid. For the other exposures, thyroid shield augments little to the reduction achieved by rectangular collimation. The use of thyroid shield is to be advised, when performing upper anterior radiography.

Keywords: dental radiography; radiation dosimetry; radiation protection; thyroid gland.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Handheld thyroid shield during upper incisor periapical exposure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Position of the detector on the lower slabs of the phantom. The round active detecting area is inside the contour of the neck and anterior to the cervical vertebral body. (b) Phantom assembled on top of the detector. (c) Experimental setting during upper incisor exposure of the phantom without thyroid shield with detector in place and (d) with thyroid shield.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagram of the mean dose level measured at the thyroid for the different geometries with round collimation and rectangular (rect.) collimation, with and without thyroid shielding (TS). BW: bitewing; Csup: upper canine; Isup: upper incisor; Msup: upper molar; Psup: upper bicuspid.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Commission on Radiation Protection. 1977 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiation Protection, ICRP publication 26. Ann ICRP 1977; 1(3).
    1. ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007; 37(2–4). - PubMed
    1. Memon A, Godward S, Williams D, Siddique I, Al-Saleh K. Dental X-rays and the risk of thyroid cancer: a case-control study. Acta Oncol 2010; 49: 447–53. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02841861003705778 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rush ER, Thompson NA. Dental radiography technique and equipment: how they influence the radiation dose received at the level of the thyroid gland. Radiography 2007; 13: 214–20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2006.03.002 - DOI
    1. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139: 1237–43. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0339 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types