Tracking and Locating Itinerant Subjects With a Rechargeable Incentive Card: Results of a Randomized Trial
- PMID: 27008417
- PMCID: PMC4874473
- DOI: 10.3109/10826084.2015.1126748
Tracking and Locating Itinerant Subjects With a Rechargeable Incentive Card: Results of a Randomized Trial
Abstract
Background: High attrition among research participants undermines the validity and generalizability of field research. This study contrasted two incentivizing methods--money orders (MOs) or rechargeable incentive cards (RICs)--with regard to rates of participants' study engagement and follow-up contact over a 6-month period.
Methods: Substance abusers (N = 303) in Los Angeles, California were recruited and randomized to either an MO (control) or RIC (experimental) condition. All participants were asked to call the researchers at the beginning of each calendar month for the ensuing 5 months to update their locator information, even if nothing had changed. Each call resulted in a $10 payment, issued immediately via the RIC system or by MO by mail. Research staff located and interviewed all participants at Month 6. Contact logs assessed level of effort required to locate participants and conduct follow-up interviews.
Results: Relative to controls, RIC participants, especially those with low ability to defer gratification, initiated more monthly calls. Six-month follow-up rates did not differ between RIC (75%) and controls (79%), though the RIC condition was associated with an average staff time savings of 39.8 minutes per study participant.
Discussion: For longitudinal public health research involving itinerant study participants, the RIC method produces a modest benefit in study engagement and reduced staff time devoted to participant tracking and payments. However, the overall cost-effectiveness of this approach will depend on the pricing model of the card-issuing vendor (which in turns depends on the scale of the project, with per-unit costs falling for larger projects).
Keywords: Follow-up; incentivizing; tracking.
Figures
References
-
- Crisanti AS, Case BF, Isakson BL, Steadman HJ. Understanding study attrition in the evaluation of jail diversion programs for persons with serious mental illness or co-occurring substance use disorders. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2014 0093854813514580.
-
- De Jarlais DC, Perlis TE, Settembrino JM. The use of electronic debit cards in longitudinal data collection with geographically mobile drug users. Drug & Alcohol Dependence. 2005;77:1–5. - PubMed
-
- Federal Reserve System. The 2004 Federal Reserve Payments Study Analysis of Noncash Payments Trends in the United States: 2000–2003. Washington, DC: FRS; 2004.
-
- Hansten ML, Downey L, Rosengren DB, Donovan DM. Relationship between follow-up rates and treatment outcomes in substance abuse research: more is better but when is “enough” enough? Addiction. 2000;95:1403–16. - PubMed
-
- Hayashi F, Cuddy E. General purpose reloadable prepaid cards: penetration, use, fees, and fraud risks. Presented at 50th Annual Conference on Bank Structure and Competition; Chicago, IL. May 2014.2014.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous