Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 25;58(2):163-9.
doi: 10.1539/joh.15-0056-OA. Epub 2016 Mar 24.

Predictive value and construct validity of the work functioning screener-healthcare (WFS-H)

Affiliations

Predictive value and construct validity of the work functioning screener-healthcare (WFS-H)

Edwin J Boezeman et al. J Occup Health. .

Abstract

Objectives: To test the predictive value and convergent construct validity of a 6-item work functioning screener (WFS-H).

Methods: Healthcare workers (249 nurses) completed a questionnaire containing the work functioning screener (WFS-H) and a work functioning instrument (NWFQ) measuring the following: cognitive aspects of task execution and general incidents, avoidance behavior, conflicts and irritation with colleagues, impaired contact with patients and their family, and level of energy and motivation. Productivity and mental health were also measured. Negative and positive predictive values, AUC values, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated to examine the predictive value of the screener. Correlation analysis was used to examine the construct validity.

Results: The screener had good predictive value, since the results showed that a negative screener score is a strong indicator of work functioning not hindered by mental health problems (negative predictive values: 94%-98%; positive predictive values: 21%-36%; AUC:.64-.82; sensitivity: 42%-76%; and specificity 85%-87%). The screener has good construct validity due to moderate, but significant (p<.001), associations with productivity (r=.51), mental health (r=.48), and distress (r=.47).

Conclusions: The screener (WFS-H) had good predictive value and good construct validity. Its score offers occupational health professionals a helpful preliminary insight into the work functioning of healthcare workers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. ROC-Curves

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Noben C, Smit F, Nieuwenhuijsen K, et al. . Comparative cost-effectiveness of two interventions to promote work functioning by targeting mental health complaints among nurses: Pragmatic cluster randomised trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2014; 51: 1321-1331. - PubMed
    1. Weinberg A, Creed F. Stress and psychiatric disorder in healthcare professionals and hospital staff. Lancet 2000; 355: 533-537. - PubMed
    1. Gärtner FR, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Van Dijk FJ, Sluiter JK. The impact of common mental disorders on the work functioning of nurses and allied health professionals: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2010; 47: 1047-1061. - PubMed
    1. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Franche RL, Van Dijk FJ. Work functioning measurement: Tools for occupational mental health research. J Occup Environ Med 2010; 52: 778-790. - PubMed
    1. Blozik E, Scherer M, Lacruz ME, Ladwig KH; KORA Study Group . Diagnostic utility of a one-item question to screen for depressive disorders: Results from the KORA F3 study. BMC Fam Pract 2013; 14: 198-205. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types