Considerations for the combination of anticancer vaccines and immune checkpoint inhibitors
- PMID: 27010190
- PMCID: PMC6599515
- DOI: 10.1517/14712598.2016.1170805
Considerations for the combination of anticancer vaccines and immune checkpoint inhibitors
Abstract
Introduction: Over the past few years, trials evaluating immunotherapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, have revolutionized the standard model of cancer treatment, demonstrating significant antitumor responses and improved clinical outcomes across a wide array of tumors types. Yet, despite these compelling data, a major limitation has been that only a fraction of patients mount a response to single-agent immune checkpoint inhibition. However, a growing amount of preclinical and clinical data suggests that combining immune checkpoint inhibition, either with other immune checkpoint inhibitors or with therapeutic cancer vaccines, has the potential to improve the proportion of patients seeing long-term durable responses with these therapies.
Areas covered: We have reviewed the reported data on immune checkpoint inhibition as monotherapy and as combination therapy with other immune checkpoint inhibitors or therapeutic cancer vaccines. Data is reviewed on agents with FDA approval or breakthrough designation as of the writing of this manuscript.
Expert opinion: Particular focus is given to the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and therapeutic cancer vaccines which has the potential to increase efficacy compared to single agent immune checkpoint inhibition with minimal added toxicity.
Keywords: Immune checkpoint inhibitors; immunogenic intensification; therapeutic cancer vaccines.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interest
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
References
-
- Mahoney KM, Atkins MB. Prognostic and predictive markers for the new immunotherapies. Oncology (Williston Park). 2014;28(Suppl 3):39–48. - PubMed
-
- Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:711–723. doi:10.1056/NEJMoal003466. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
• This phase III trial was the first to show an overall survival benefit for immune checkpoint inhibition in solid tumors and led to FDA approval of ipilimumab for advanced melanoma.
-
- Weber J, Minor D, D’Angelo S, et al. A phase 3 randomized, open-label study of nivolumab (anti-PD-1; BMS-936558; ONO-4538) versus investigator’s choice chemotherapy (ICC) in patients with advanced melanoma after prior anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(suppl4):abstrLBA3-PR.
-
• This trial led to FDA approval of nivolumab for advanced melanoma after prior CTLA-4 therapy.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous