Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Sep 15;41(18):E1074-E1080.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001576.

The Effect of Sitting on Stability Balls on Nonspecific Lower Back Pain, Disability, and Core Endurance: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study

Tessa Lillis Poirier Elliott  1   2 , Kyra Stanise Marshall  1 , David Allen Lake  1 , Nancy Henderson Wofford  1 , George James Davies  1   3   4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The Effect of Sitting on Stability Balls on Nonspecific Lower Back Pain, Disability, and Core Endurance: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study

Tessa Lillis Poirier Elliott et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). .

Abstract

Study design: Experimental randomized crossover.

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine whether sitting on a ball for 90 min/d instead of a chair has an effect on low back pain (LBP), low back disability, and/or core muscle endurance.

Summary of background data: LBP may result from prolonged sitting. It has been proposed that replacing chairs with stability balls can diminish LBP in those who sit for prolonged periods. Research on the topic is sparse and inconclusive.

Methods: A total of 90 subjects (university students, staff, and faculty, ages 18-65, who sit ≥4 hr/d) were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group for the first part of the study. Baseline data were collected: Oswestry Disability Index, a numerical pain rating scale for LBP, and four core muscle endurance tests. For 8 weeks, the control group sat on their usual chair. The intervention group sat on stability balls 5 d/wk, increasing up to 90 min/d. Baseline measurements were repeated postintervention. After a washout period, subjects switched groups, and the procedures were repeated-70 completed participation in control group and 76 in intervention group.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences for pain or disability in either group (P > 0.05). Changes in isometric trunk flexion (P = 0.001), nondominant side plank (P = 0.008), and Sorensen (P = 0.006) endurance scores were significant within the intervention group but not the control group. Between-group comparisons revealed a significant difference for isometric trunk flexion (P = 0.005) and Sorensen endurance times (P = 0.010). Analysis also showed that ball-sitting did not prevent an increase in LBP over the 8-week period.

Conclusion: Ball-sitting had no significant effects on LBP or associated disability, but did improve core endurance in the sagittal plane. Although ball-sitting may be useful as an adjunct treatment for LBP when core muscles are involved, clinicians should rely on other, evidence-based treatments for LBP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Balagué F, Mannion AF, Pellisé F, et al. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet 2012; 379:482–491.
    1. Koes B, Tulder M. Acute low back pain. Am Fam Physician 2006; 74:803–805.
    1. Anderson G. Frymoyer J. The epidemiology of spinal disorders. The Adult Spine: Principles and Practice 2nd ed.New York, NY: Raven Press; 1997. 93–141.
    1. Mehra M, Hill K, Nicholl D, et al. The burden of chronic low back pain with and without a neuropathic component: a healthcare resource use and cost analysis. J Med Econ 2012; 15:245–252.
    1. Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147:478–491.

Publication types