Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 27;2(4):374-84.
doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnv053. eCollection 2015 Dec.

Risk factors for the need of hip arthroscopy following periacetabular osteotomy

Affiliations

Risk factors for the need of hip arthroscopy following periacetabular osteotomy

Charlotte Hartig-Andreasen et al. J Hip Preserv Surg. .

Abstract

Despite the frequency of labral tears in symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip, no consensus exists regarding the treatment of coexisting dysplasia of the hip and tearing of the acetabular labrum. The purpose of this prospective, MR arthrography (MRA) based 2-year follow-up study was to identify risk factors predicting the need for a hip arthroscopy (HA) after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Ninety-nine patients (104 hips) scheduled for PAO were evaluated preoperatively and at 2-year follow-up. MRA was performed in all patients prior to PAO. At follow-up, patients were divided into a non-arthroscopy and arthroscopy group. The two groups were compared clinical and radiological, and risk factors for HA after PAO were calculated. Patient reported outcome measures (WOMAC, Oxford Hip and SF36) were filled out before PAO and at follow-up. Ninety-five hips (91.3%) were evaluated. Twenty-six hips (27%) required an arthroscopy within 2 years of the PAO. Risk factors were preoperative borderline dysplasia, acetabular retroversion and complete labral detachment. Labral tearing, degeneration or hypertrophy did not negatively affect the outcome of PAO. Patients not requiring an arthroscopy had a statistically significant better outcome measured by patients reported outcome measures. After PAO, 27% of the hips needed intra-articular assessment. Conventional radiographs and MRA analysis can be used to identify predictors for patients requiring HA after PAO. At 2-year follow-up, the clinical outcome improved in all patients. However, those patients who had no need of a HA after their PAO had superior results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
MRA measurement of the α-angle of Notzli on the oblique plane. After identification of the center of the femoral head, a line along the middle of the femoral neck and a line from the center to the point where the femoral head-neck junction ‘left’ the best fitted circle of the femoral head make up the α-angle.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Changes in SF36 subscale parameters for 90 patients before PAO and at 2-year follow-up after PAO. The postoperative subscale parameters are also illustrated separately for the nonarthroscopy group (dash) and the arthroscopy group (dot). SF36 consist of eight subscales with health-related parameters: physical functioning (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE) and mental health (MH).

References

    1. Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh TS, et al. A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias. technique and preliminary results . Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 232: 26–36. - PubMed
    1. Dorrell JH, Catterall A. The torn acetabular labrum . J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986; 68: 400–3. - PubMed
    1. Domb BG, Lareau JM, Baydoun H, et al. Is intraarticular pathology common in patients with hip dysplasia undergoing periacetabular osteotomy? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472: 674–80 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klaue K, Durnin CW, Ganz R. The acetabular rim syndrome. A clinical presentation of dysplasia of the hip . J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73: 423–9. - PubMed
    1. McCarthy JC, Lee JA. Acetabular dysplasia: A paradigm of arthroscopic examination of chondral injuries . Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 405: 122–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources