Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 24:5:48.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0226-4.

Blinding in randomized controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: protocol for a systematic review and empirical study

Affiliations

Blinding in randomized controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: protocol for a systematic review and empirical study

Pascal Probst et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Blinding is a measure in randomized controlled trials (RCT) to reduce detection and performance bias. There is evidence that lack of blinding leads to overestimated treatment effects. Because of the physical component of interventions, blinding is not easily applicable in surgical trials. This is a protocol for a systematic review and empirical study about actual impact on outcomes and future potential of blinding in general and abdominal surgery RCT.

Methods/design: A systematic literature search in CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Web of Science will be conducted to locate RCT between 1996 and 2015 with a surgical intervention. General study characteristics and information on blinding methods will be extracted. The risk of performance and detection bias will be rated as low, unclear or high according to the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. The main outcome of interest will be the association of a high risk of performance or detection bias with significant trial results and will be tested at a level of significance of 5 %. Further, trials will be meta-analysed in a Mantel-Haenszel model comparing trials with high risk of bias to other trials at a level of significance of 5 %.

Discussion: Detection and performance bias distort treatment effects. The degree of such bias in general and abdominal surgery is unknown. Evidence on influence of missing blinding would improve critical appraisal and conduct of general and abdominal surgery RCT.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO 2015: CRD42015026837.

Keywords: Bias; Blinding; Detection bias; General and abdominal surgery; Performance bias; Randomized controlled trial; Risk of bias; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PICO question and search strategy for MEDLINE (via PubMed)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Conceptual visualization of the included study sample

References

    1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71–2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, Badenoch D, Straus S, Haynes B, Dawes M. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine—levels of evidence (March 2009). Available from: www.cebm.net/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence-march... accessed 01 Nov 2015)
    1. Solomon MJ, McLeod RS. Should we be performing more randomized controlled trials in evaluating surgical procedures? Surgery. 1995;118:459–67. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6060(05)80359-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cochrane Handbook: Higgins JPT. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org. (Accessed 01 Nov 2015)
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials. 2010;11:32. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-32. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources