Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 10:7:250.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00250. eCollection 2016.

Leaf Morphology, Photosynthetic Performance, Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Stomatal Development of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Exposed to Different Ratios of Red Light to Blue Light

Affiliations

Leaf Morphology, Photosynthetic Performance, Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Stomatal Development of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Exposed to Different Ratios of Red Light to Blue Light

Jun Wang et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Red and blue light are both vital factors for plant growth and development. We examined how different ratios of red light to blue light (R/B) provided by light-emitting diodes affected photosynthetic performance by investigating parameters related to photosynthesis, including leaf morphology, photosynthetic rate, chlorophyll fluorescence, stomatal development, light response curve, and nitrogen content. In this study, lettuce plants (Lactuca sativa L.) were exposed to 200 μmol⋅m(-2)⋅s(-1) irradiance for a 16 h⋅d(-1) photoperiod under the following six treatments: monochromatic red light (R), monochromatic blue light (B) and the mixture of R and B with different R/B ratios of 12, 8, 4, and 1. Leaf photosynthetic capacity (A max) and photosynthetic rate (P n) increased with decreasing R/B ratio until 1, associated with increased stomatal conductance, along with significant increase in stomatal density and slight decrease in stomatal size. P n and A max under B treatment had 7.6 and 11.8% reduction in comparison with those under R/B = 1 treatment, respectively. The effective quantum yield of PSII and the efficiency of excitation captured by open PSII center were also significantly lower under B treatment than those under the other treatments. However, shoot dry weight increased with increasing R/B ratio with the greatest value under R/B = 12 treatment. The increase of shoot dry weight was mainly caused by increasing leaf area and leaf number, but no significant difference was observed between R and R/B = 12 treatments. Based on the above results, we conclude that quantitative B could promote photosynthetic performance or growth by stimulating morphological and physiological responses, yet there was no positive correlation between P n and shoot dry weight accumulation.

Keywords: Lactuca sativa L.; R/B ratio; chlorophyll fluorescence; dry weight; photosynthetic performance; stomata.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The effect of different R/B ratios on Pn(A), Ci(B), Ls(C), and gm(D) at the growth irradiance of lettuce. Values were the means of four replicates with standard errors shown by vertical bars. Different letters indicate significant differences using the Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (p < 0.05; n = 4).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Correlation analysis between Pn and gs (A), Ls (B), and gm (C) of lettuce grown under different R/B ratios treatments. Values were the means of four replicates with standard errors shown by vertical bars. Different letters indicate significant differences using the Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (p < 0.05; n = 4).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Response of Pn to irradiance for lettuce leaves grown under different R/B ratios treatments. Values were the means of four replicates with standard errors shown by vertical bars (n = 4).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Response of gs to irradiance for lettuce leaves grown under different R/B ratios. Values were the means of four replicates with standard errors shown by vertical bars (n = 4).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Effect of different R/B ratios on the ratio of leaf Amax to nitrogen content per LA (NUE). Values were the means of four replicates with standard errors shown by vertical bars. Different letters indicate significant difference using the Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (p < 0.05; n = 4).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aksenova N. P., Konstantinova T. N., Sergeeva L. I., Macháčková I., Golyanovskaya S. A. (1994). Morphogenesis of potato plants in vitro. I. Effect of light quality and hormones. J. Plant Growth Regul. 13 143–146. 10.1007/BF00196378 - DOI
    1. Appelgren M. (1991). Effects of light quality on stem elongation of Pelargonium in vitro. Sci. Hortic. 45 345–351. 10.1016/0304-4238(91)90081-9 - DOI
    1. Bondada B. R., Syvertsen J. P. (2003). Leaf chlorophyll, net gas exchange and chloroplast ultrastructure in citrus leaves of different nitrogen status. Tree Physiol. 23 553–559. 10.1093/treephys/23.8.553 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown C. S., Schuerger A. C., Sager J. C. (1995). Growth and photomorphogenesis of pepper plants under red light-emitting diodes with supplemental blue or far-red lighting. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 120 808–813. - PubMed
    1. Christie J. M. (2007). Phototropin blue-light receptors. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 58 21–45. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103951 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources