Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 25:16:286.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2941-0.

A systematic review of the health and well-being impacts of school gardening: synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence

Affiliations

A systematic review of the health and well-being impacts of school gardening: synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence

Heather Ohly et al. BMC Public Health. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: School gardening programmes are increasingly popular, with suggested benefits including healthier eating and increased physical activity. Our objectives were to understand the health and well-being impacts of school gardens and the factors that help or hinder their success.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence (PROSPERO CRD42014007181). We searched multiple databases and used a range of supplementary approaches. Studies about school gardens were included if they reported on physical or mental health or well-being. Quantitative studies had to include a comparison group. Studies were quality appraised using appropriate tools. Findings were narratively synthesised and the qualitative evidence used to produce a conceptual framework to illustrate how benefits might be accrued.

Results: Evidence from 40 articles (21 quantitative studies; 16 qualitative studies; 3 mixed methods studies) was included. Generally the quantitative research was poor. Evidence for changes in fruit and vegetable intake was limited and based on self-report. The qualitative research was better quality and ascribed a range of health and well-being impacts to school gardens, with some idealistic expectations for their impact in the long term. Groups of pupils who do not excel in classroom activities were thought to particularly benefit. Lack of funding and over reliance on volunteers were thought to threaten success, while involvement with local communities and integration of gardening activities into the school curriculum were thought to support success.

Conclusion: More robust quantitative research is needed to convincingly support the qualitative evidence suggesting wide ranging benefits from school gardens.

Keywords: Gardens; Health; Mixed methods; School; Systematic review; Well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart showing the identification and selection of studies
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Graph showing quality ratings of included quantitative studies (n = 24) using the individual EPHPP criteria and overall rating
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Conceptual model showing the potential health and well-being impacts of school gardening

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. RHS Campaign for School Gardening. [http://apps.rhs.org.uk/schoolgardening/default.aspa]
    1. Stephanie Alexander Kitchen Garden Program. [http://www.kitchengardenfoundation.org.au/] - PubMed
    1. Ozer EJ. The effects of school gardens on students and schools: conceptualization and considerations for maximizing healthy development. Health Educ Behav. 2007;34(6):846–63. doi: 10.1177/1090198106289002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blair D. The child in the garden: An evaluative review of the benefits of school gardening. J Environ Educ. 2009;40(2):15–38. doi: 10.3200/JOEE.40.2.15-38. - DOI
    1. Robinson-O'Brien R, Story M, Heim S. Impact of garden-based youth nutrition intervention programs: a review. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(2):273–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.051. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types