Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;24(1):2-12.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv210. Epub 2016 Mar 27.

A proposed national research and development agenda for population health informatics: summary recommendations from a national expert workshop

Affiliations

A proposed national research and development agenda for population health informatics: summary recommendations from a national expert workshop

Hadi Kharrazi et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: The Johns Hopkins Center for Population Health IT hosted a 1-day symposium sponsored by the National Library of Medicine to help develop a national research and development (R&D) agenda for the emerging field of population health informatics (PopHI).

Material and methods: The symposium provided a venue for national experts to brainstorm, identify, discuss, and prioritize the top challenges and opportunities in the PopHI field, as well as R&D areas to address these.

Results: This manuscript summarizes the findings of the PopHI symposium. The symposium participants' recommendations have been categorized into 13 overarching themes, including policy alignment, data governance, sustainability and incentives, and standards/interoperability.

Discussion: The proposed consensus-based national agenda for PopHI consisted of 18 priority recommendations grouped into 4 broad goals: (1) Developing a standardized collaborative framework and infrastructure, (2) Advancing technical tools and methods, (3) Developing a scientific evidence and knowledge base, and (4) Developing an appropriate framework for policy, privacy, and sustainability. There was a substantial amount of agreement between all the participants on the challenges and opportunities for PopHI as well as on the actions that needed to be taken to address these.

Conclusion: PopHI is a rapidly growing field that has emerged to address the population dimension of the Triple Aim. The proposed PopHI R&D agenda is comprehensive and timely, but should be considered only a starting-point, given that ongoing developments in health policy, population health management, and informatics are very dynamic, suggesting that the agenda will require constant monitoring and updating.

Keywords: informatics agenda; population health informatics; public health informatics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1A.
Figure 1A.
The varying contexts of population health informatics, public health informatics, and clinical informatics. EHR, electronic health record; HIT, health information technology. aThere are no clear boundaries for the intervention targets. Interventions are ordered by the most to the least common target constituents. See Figure 1B for a visual representation of the overlapping intervention targets. Figure 1B Schematic diagram, adapted from the Institute of Medicine’s participating constituents of primary care, depicting the overlapping intervention targets listed in Figure 1A. bTotal population of a geographical boundary (eg, a community surrounding a provider), regardless of their attribution to an individual entity (eg, a healthcare provider or an employer). cTarget population attributed to an individual entity (eg, a healthcare provider or an employer). In the case of a healthcare provider, the target population will be the entire denominator of their patients or parts of it.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Overview of key symposium recommendations for a national PopHI R&D agenda. aThe first three categories include key recommendations with policy, privacy and sustainability components; however, these key items were categorized in different groups, due to their focus on those topics. ACO, Accountable Care Organization; CS, computer science; GIS, geographic information system; HIE, health information exchange; IDS, integrated delivery system/network; PopHI, population health informatics; R&D, research and development.

References

    1. Charles D, Gabriel M, Furukawa M. Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems among U.S. Non-federal Acute Care Hospitals: 2008-2013. Office of National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; 2014 https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/oncdatabrief16.pdf. Accessed March 4, 2013.
    1. Charles D, King J, Furukawa MF, Patel V. Hospital adoption of electronic health record technology to meet meaningful use objectives: 2008-2012. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. 2013. http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/oncdatabrief10final.pdf. Accessed March 2, 2013.
    1. Jha A, Burke M, DesRoches C, et al. Progress toward meaningful use: hospitals’ adoption of electronic health records. Am J Managed Care. 2011;17 (12 Spec No.):SP117-SP124. - PubMed
    1. Hsiao CJ, Hing E, Ashman J. Trends in Electronic Health Record system use among office-based physicians: United States, 2007-2012. National Center for Health Statistics. 2014. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr075.pdf. Accessed September 20, 2014.
    1. Friedman DG, Parrish GR. The population health record: concepts, definition, design, and implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17:359–366. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types