Discussion: The Economic Impact of Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in High-Risk Abdominal Incisions: A Cost-Utility Analysis
- PMID: 27018683
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002025
Discussion: The Economic Impact of Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in High-Risk Abdominal Incisions: A Cost-Utility Analysis
Comment on
-
The Economic Impact of Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in High-Risk Abdominal Incisions: A Cost-Utility Analysis.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Apr;137(4):1284-1289. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002024. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016. PMID: 27018682
References
-
- Semsarzadeh NN, Tadisina KK, Maddox J, Chopra K, Singh DP. Closed incision negative-pressure therapy is associated with decreased surgical-site infections: A meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:592–602.
-
- Condé-Green A, Chung TL, Holton LH III, et al. Incisional negative-pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings following abdominal wall reconstruction: A comparative study. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71:394–397.
-
- Soares KC, Baltodano PA, Hicks CW, et al. Novel wound management system reduction of surgical site morbidity after ventral hernia repairs: A critical analysis. Am J Surg. 2015;209:324–332.
-
- Adogwa O, Fatemi P, Perez E, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy reduces incidence of postoperative wound infection and dehiscence after long-segment thoracolumbar spinal fusion: A single institutional experience. Spine J. 2014;14:2911–2917.
-
- Lopez J, Prifogle E, Nyame TT, Milton J, May JW Jr.. The impact of conflicts of interest in plastic surgery: An analysis of acellular dermal matrix, implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:1328–1334.