Away Rotations and Matching in Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: Applicant and Program Director Perspectives
- PMID: 27018690
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002029
Away Rotations and Matching in Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: Applicant and Program Director Perspectives
Abstract
Background: Although nearly all medical students pursuing integrated plastic surgery residency participate in elective rotations away from their home medical school, the value and costs of these "away" rotations have not been well studied.
Methods: The authors surveyed all integrated plastic surgery program directors and all applicants in the 2015 National Residency Matching Program.
Results: Forty-two program directors and 149 applicants (64 percent and 70 percent response rate, respectively) completed the survey. Applicants reported 13.7 weeks spent on plastic surgery rotations during medical school, including a mean of 9.2 weeks on away rotations. Average reported cost for away rotations was $3591 per applicant. Both applicants and program directors most commonly reported "making a good impression" (44.6 percent and 36.6 percent, respectively) or finding a "good-fit" program (27.7 percent and 48.8 percent, respectively) as the primary goal for away rotations. Almost all applicants (91.1 percent) believed an away rotation made them more competitive for matching to a program at which they rotated. Program directors ranked a strong away rotation performance as the most important residency selection criterion. Twenty-seven percent of postgraduate year-1 positions were filled by an away rotatorm and an additional 17 percent were filled by a home medical student.
Conclusions: Away rotations appear to be mutually beneficial for applicants and programs in helping to establish a good fit between students and training programs through an extended interaction with the students, residents, and faculty. In addition, making a good impression on a senior elective rotation (home or away) may improve an applicant's chance of matching to a residency program.
Comment in
-
COVID-19 Effects on 2021 Home Program Match Rates at Integrated Plastic Surgery Programs.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Feb 1;149(2):368e-369e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008746. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022. PMID: 34958637 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Liang M, Signer MM. Charting outcomes in the match: Characteristics of applicants who matched to their preferred specialty in the 2014 NRMP main residency match. Available at: http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Charting-Outcomes-2014-Fi.... Accessed May 1, 2015.
-
- Liang F, Rudnicki PA, Prince NH, Lipsitz S, May JW Jr, Guo L. An evaluation of plastic surgery resident selection factors. J Surg Educ. 2015;72:8–15.
-
- Nation Resident Matching Program. Charting outcomes in the Match; 2014. Available at: http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Charting-Outcomes-2014-Fi.... Accessed June 27, 2015.
-
- Baldwin K, Weidner Z, Ahn J, Mehta S. Are away rotations critical for a successful match in orthopaedic surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:3340–3345.
-
- Clarke JT, Miller JJ, Sceppa J, Goldsmith LA, Long E. Success in the dermatology resident match in 2003: Perceptions and importance of home institutions and away rotations. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:927–947.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
