Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Apr;41(7):563-7.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001272.

Can Decision Support Help Patients With Spinal Stenosis Make a Treatment Choice?: A Prospective Study Assessing the Impact of a Patient Decision Aid and Health Coaching

Stephen Kearing  1 , Susan Z Berg, Jon D Lurie
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Can Decision Support Help Patients With Spinal Stenosis Make a Treatment Choice?: A Prospective Study Assessing the Impact of a Patient Decision Aid and Health Coaching

Stephen Kearing et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Study design: A prospective, randomized study on patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who received a decision support intervention to facilitate their treatment choice.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of telephone health coaching (HC) in addition to a video decision aid (DA) compared with a DA alone for patients with spinal stenosis.

Summary of background data: Treatment options for lumbar spinal stenosis include surgical and nonsurgical approaches. Patient DAs and HC have been shown to help patients make an informed treatment choice consistent with personal preferences.

Methods: Eligible patients with spinal stenosis were identified by an orthopedic surgeon or a nonsurgical spine specialist. Consenting participants were randomly assigned to either a video DA or a video DA along with HC (DA + HC). Patients completed baseline and follow-up questionnaires at 2 weeks, and 6 months after the decision support intervention(s).

Results: Ninety-eight patients were randomized to the DA + HC group and 101 to the DA-only group; 168 of 199 (84%) patients completed responses at all time points. Both groups showed improved understanding of spinal stenosis treatments and progress in decision making after watching the DA (P < 0.001). At 2 weeks, more patients in the coaching group had made a treatment decision (DA + HC 74% vs. DA only 52%, P < 0.01). At 6-month follow-up, the uptake of surgery was similar for both groups (DA + HC 21% had surgery vs. DA only 17%); satisfaction with the treatments received was similar for both groups (DA + HC, 84% satisfied vs. DA only, 85%).

Conclusion: These results suggest that watching the video DA improved patient knowledge and reduced decisional uncertainty about their spinal stenosis treatment choice. The addition of telephone coaching helped some patients choose a treatment more quickly; 6-month decisional outcomes were similar for both groups.

Level of evidence: 3.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient enrollment (CONSORT flow diagram)
Figure 2a
Figure 2a
Mean patient knowledge of treatment facts (% correct)
Figure 2b
Figure 2b
Mean patient decisional conflict scores (uncertainty) over time
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Wennberg JE, Fisher ES, Skinner JS. Geography and the Debate over Medicare Reform. Health Affairs. 2002;(Suppl Web Exclusives):W96–114. - PubMed
    1. Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 1997;2:112–121. - PubMed
    1. Coulter A, Ellins J. Effectiveness of Strategies for Informing, Educating, and Involving Patients. British Medical Journal. 2007;335:24–27. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine . Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. National Academies Press; Washington DC: 2004. - PubMed
    1. Lurie JD, Spratt KF, Blood EA, et al. Effects of viewing an evidence-based video decision aid on patients' treatment preferences for spine surgery. Spine. 2011;36:1501–4. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types