Randomized double-blind comparison of ephedrine and phenylephrine for management of post-spinal hypotension in potential fetal compromise
- PMID: 27020488
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.02.004
Randomized double-blind comparison of ephedrine and phenylephrine for management of post-spinal hypotension in potential fetal compromise
Abstract
Background: Most studies comparing phenylephrine and ephedrine have been conducted during elective caesarean sections in healthy mothers with no fetal compromise. The effect of vasopressors on fetal outcome may differ between healthy and compromised fetuses. There has been little research into the effect of phenylephrine and ephedrine, when used for management of post-spinal hypotension in the presence of potential fetal compromise.
Methods: Healthy women with a singleton pregnancy undergoing emergency caesarean section for fetal compromise under spinal anaesthesia were studied. One-hundred-and-six consecutive subjects, who developed hypotension after spinal anaesthesia, were randomly allocated to two groups of 53 each, to receive either phenylephrine (Group P) or ephedrine (Group E). For every systolic blood pressure reading <100mmHg patients received phenylephrine 100μg or ephedrine 8mg depending on group allocation. Umbilical blood gas parameters and Apgar scores were recorded.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference in umbilical arterial pH (P=0.79), umbilical venous pH (P=0.98), other blood gas parameters, incidence of fetal acidosis (P=1.00) and Apgar scores. The number of hypotensive episodes, vasopressor doses for treatment of the first hypotensive episode and the total number of doses used during the study period were comparable. The median [IQR] total number of doses of phenylephrine and ephedrine used before delivery were 2 [1-2] and 2 [1-2], respectively (P=0.67). More patients receiving ephedrine (24.5%) developed tachycardia than those receiving phenylephrine (3.8%) (P=0.004). Bradycardia was more common with phenylephrine, with 39.6% of patients in Group P as compared to only 1.9% of patients in Group E developing a heart rate <60beats/min after vasopressor administration (P=0.001).
Conclusions: Both phenylephrine 100μg and ephedrine 8mg boluses are equally efficacious when treating post-spinal hypotension in the presence of potential fetal compromise. However, phenylephrine may be a better choice in the presence of maternal tachycardia.
Keywords: Caesarean section; Ephedrine; Fetal compromise; Phenylephrine; Spinal anaesthesia.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Neonatal outcomes following phenylephrine or norepinephrine for treatment of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension at emergency caesarean section in women with fetal compromise: a randomised controlled study.Int J Obstet Anesth. 2022 Feb;49:103247. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2021.103247. Epub 2021 Dec 17. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2022. PMID: 35012812 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomised double-blind comparison of bolus phenylephrine or ephedrine for treatment of hypotension in women with pre-eclampsia undergoing caesarean section.Anaesthesia. 2018 Jul;73(7):839-846. doi: 10.1111/anae.14268. Epub 2018 Mar 9. Anaesthesia. 2018. PMID: 29520867 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized trial comparing prophylactic phenylephrine and ephedrine infusion during spinal anesthesia for emergency cesarean delivery in cases of acute fetal compromise.J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 May 12. J Clin Anesth. 2016. PMID: 27687377 Clinical Trial.
-
A quantitative, systematic review of randomized controlled trials of ephedrine versus phenylephrine for the management of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.Anesth Analg. 2002 Apr;94(4):920-6, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200204000-00028. Anesth Analg. 2002. PMID: 11916798
-
[Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: fluid loading, vasopressors and hypotension].Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2007 Jul-Aug;26(7-8):688-93. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jun 27. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2007. PMID: 17590565 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32619039 Free PMC article.
-
Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 4;8(8):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7:CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4. PMID: 28976555 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
-
Comparison of Phenylephrine and Ephedrine in Treatment of Spinal-Induced Hypotension in High-Risk Pregnancies: A Narrative Review.Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Jan 20;4:2. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00002. eCollection 2017. Front Med (Lausanne). 2017. PMID: 28164084 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Comparative Study of Three Vasopressors for Maintenance of Blood Pressure during Spinal Anesthesia in Lower Abdominal Surgeries.Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Apr-Jun;12(2):333-337. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_199_17. Anesth Essays Res. 2018. PMID: 29962593 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of vasopressors for management of hypotension in high-risk caesarean section under neuraxial anesthesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Dec 4;24(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02819-9. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024. PMID: 39633265 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical