Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 29:6:23728.
doi: 10.1038/srep23728.

Maintained larval growth in mussel larvae exposed to acidified under-saturated seawater

Affiliations

Maintained larval growth in mussel larvae exposed to acidified under-saturated seawater

Alexander Ventura et al. Sci Rep. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Ocean acidification (OA) is known to affect bivalve early life-stages. We tested responses of blue mussel larvae to a wide range of pH in order to identify their tolerance threshold. Our results confirmed that decreasing seawater pH and decreasing saturation state increases larval mortality rate and the percentage of abnormally developing larvae. Virtually no larvae reared at average pHT 7.16 were able to feed or reach the D-shell stage and their development appeared to be arrested at the trochophore stage. However larvae were capable of reaching the D-shell stage under milder acidification (pHT ≈ 7.35, 7.6, 7.85) including in under-saturated seawater with Ωa as low as 0.54 ± 0.01 (mean ± s. e. m.), with a tipping point for normal development identified at pHT 7.765. Additionally growth rate of normally developing larvae was not affected by lower pHT despite potential increased energy costs associated with compensatory calcification in response to increased shell dissolution. Overall, our results on OA impacts on mussel larvae suggest an average pHT of 7.16 is beyond their physiological tolerance threshold and indicate a shift in energy allocation towards growth in some individuals revealing potential OA resilience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Decreasing mortality, abnormality and maintained growth rates with increasing pH.
(a) Relationship between larval mortality rates (ln (relative density) ln (day)−1) and average pHT. Mortality rates for each point correspond to the regression slope coefficients extracted from significant power relationships between relative density and time (day). For clarity y axis values have been converted to positive values. (b) Relationship between the percentage of larval abnormality and average pHT. (c) Relationship between growth rate (μm day−1) of normally D-shaped larvae and average pHT. Growth rates for each point correspond to the regression slope coefficients extracted from significant Theil-Sen median based linear relationships between mean larval length (μm) and time (day).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Most common larval phenotypes observed throughout the course of the experiment.
(a) Trochophore stage, (b) protruding mantle, (c) indented margin, (d) convex hinge, (e) cupped and (f) normally D-shaped larva. N. B. All photos are from experiment day 11.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Lower feeding rates at nominal pH 7.1.
Mean % ± s.e.m. feeding rates (ng C ind−1 h−1) in M. edulis D-shaped larvae cultured at 5 different nominal pHs.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Quantification of calcification and dissolution using calcein.
Confocal image of calcein-labelled skeleton of 11 day old D-shaped larvae of M. edulis cultured for 2 days in green calcein (d1-2, green signal) at either pH 8.1 or pH 7.0 and then transferred for 2 days in blue calcein (d3-4, red signal). Larvae exposed to pH 7.0 at days 3–4 have a larger red band revealing increased calcification as well as less green signal suggesting higher dissolution.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Higher calcification and shell dissolution at lower pH.
Mean % ± s.e.m. relative calcification (%; (a,b)) and dissolution (%, (c)) in M. edulis 11 days old D-shaped larvae exposed to a 2 days treatment at pH 8.1 or pH 7.0 (a), then transferred to either the same (pH 8.1–8.1 and pH 7.0–7.0) or the other (pH 8.1–7.0 and pH 7.0–8.1) for 2 more days (b,c).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adelsman H. & Whitely Binder L. Ocean acidifaction: from knowledge to action, Washington state’s strategic response. Washington State Blue Ribbon Panel on Ocean Acidification. Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia. Washington. Publication no. 12-01-015 (2012).
    1. Doney S. C., Fabry V. J., Feely R. A. & Kleypas J. A. Ocean acidification: the other CO2 problem. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 1, 169–92 (2009). - PubMed
    1. Roleda M. Y., Boyd P. W. & Hurd C. L. Before ocean acidification: calcifier chemistry lessons. J. Phycol. 48, 840–843 (2012). - PubMed
    1. Mount A. S., Wheeler A. P., Paradkar R. P. & Snider D. Hemocyte-mediated shell mineralization in the eastern oyster. Science 304, 297–300 (2004). - PubMed
    1. Tunnicliffe V. et al. Survival of mussels in extremely acidic waters on a submarine volcano. Nat. Geosci. 2, 344–348 (2009).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources