Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;98(5):295-9.
doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0103. Epub 2016 Mar 29.

Hip and knee arthroplasty implants contraindicated in obesity

Affiliations

Hip and knee arthroplasty implants contraindicated in obesity

J D Craik et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 May.

Abstract

Introduction: High patient weight is a risk factor for mechanical implant failure and some manufacturers list obesity as a contraindication for implant use. We reviewed data from the 2012-2013 UK National Joint Registry to determine whether surgical practice reflects these manufacturer recommendations.

Methods: The product literature for the most commonly used hip and knee implants was reviewed for recommendations against use in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30kg/m(2)). The total number of obese patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty was calculated, as was the proportion receiving implants against manufacturer recommendations.

Results: Out of 200,054 patient records, 147,691 (74%) had a recorded BMI. The mean BMI for patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty was 29kg/m(2), compared with 31kg/m(2) for total knee arthroplasty. Of the 25 components reviewed, 5 listed obesity as a contraindication or recommended against implant use in obese patients. A total of 10,745 patients (16% of all obese patients) received implants against manufacturer recommendations.

Conclusions: A high proportion of patients are receiving implants against manufacturer recommendations. However, there are limitations to using BMI for stratifying risk of implant fatigue failure and manufacturers should therefore provide more detailed guidelines on size specific implant load limits to facilitate surgical decisions.

Keywords: Arthroplasty; Hip; Implant; Knee; Obesity; Prosthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Richmond SA, Fukuchi RK, Ezzat A et al. . Are joint injury, sport activity, physical activity, obesity, or occupational activities predictors for osteoarthritis? A systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2013; : 515–B19. - PubMed
    1. Health and Social Care Information Centre Statistics on Obesity, Physical Activity and Diet: England, 2013. London: HSCIC; 2013.
    1. National Joint Registry for England and Wales 10th Annual Report. Hemel Hempstead: NJR; 2013.
    1. Wallace G, Judge A, Prieto-Alhambra D et al. . The effect of body mass index on the risk of post-operative complications during the 6 months following total hip replacement or total knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; : 918–927. - PubMed
    1. Liu W, Wahafu T, Cheng M et al. . The influence of obesity on primary total hip arthroplasty outcomes: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015; : 289–296. - PubMed