Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2016 Mar 29:14:59.
doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0596-4.

Living cumulative network meta-analysis to reduce waste in research: A paradigmatic shift for systematic reviews?

Per Olav Vandvik  1   2 , Romina Brignardello-Petersen  3   4 , Gordon H Guyatt  3
Affiliations
Editorial

Living cumulative network meta-analysis to reduce waste in research: A paradigmatic shift for systematic reviews?

Per Olav Vandvik et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

In a recent research article in BMC Medicine, Créquit and colleagues demonstrate how published systematic reviews in lung cancer provide a fragmented, out-of-date picture of the evidence for all treatments. The results and conclusions drawn from this study, based on cumulative network meta-analyses (NMA) of evidence from randomized clinical trials over time, are quite compelling. The inherent waste of research resulting from incomplete evidence synthesis has wide-reaching implications for a range of target groups including developers of systematic reviews and guidelines and their end-users, health care professionals and patients at the point of care. Building on emerging concepts for living systematic reviews and NMA, the authors propose "living cumulative NMA" as a potential solution and paradigmatic shift. Here we describe how recent innovations within authoring, dissemination, and updating of systematic reviews and trustworthy guidelines may greatly facilitate the production of living NMA. Some additional challenges need to be solved for NMA in general, and for living cumulative NMA in particular, before a paradigmatic shift for systematic reviews can become reality.Please see related research article: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-016-0555-0.

Keywords: Clinical practice guidelines; Evidence-based medicine; GRADE; Knowledge translation; Network meta-analysis; Systematic reviews.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade M, Cook D. Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. 3. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education, American Medical Association; 2015.
    1. Andrews JC, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(7):726–735. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Treweek S, Oxman AD, Alderson P, et al. Developing and evaluating communication strategies to support informed decisions and practice based on evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results. Implement Sci. 2013;8:6. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laine C, Taichman DB, Mulrow C. Trustworthy clinical guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(11):774–775. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-11-201106070-00011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ. 2008;336(7651):995–998. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources