Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;25(8):2646-2655.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4087-0. Epub 2016 Mar 29.

An in vitro analysis of medial structures and a medial soft tissue reconstruction in a constrained condylar total knee arthroplasty

Affiliations

An in vitro analysis of medial structures and a medial soft tissue reconstruction in a constrained condylar total knee arthroplasty

Kiron K Athwal et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Aug.

Erratum in

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to quantify the medial soft tissue contributions to stability following constrained condylar (CC) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and determine whether a medial reconstruction could restore stability to a soft tissue-deficient, CC-TKA knee.

Methods: Eight cadaveric knees were mounted in a robotic system and tested at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion with ±50 N anterior-posterior force, ±8 Nm varus-valgus, and ±5 Nm internal-external torque. The deep and superficial medial collateral ligaments (dMCL, sMCL) and posteromedial capsule (PMC) were transected and their relative contributions to stabilising the applied loads were quantified. After complete medial soft tissue transection, a reconstruction using a semitendinosus tendon graft was performed, and the effect on kinematic behaviour under equivocal conditions was measured.

Results: In the CC-TKA knee, the sMCL was the major medial restraint in anterior drawer, internal-external, and valgus rotation. No significant differences were found between the rotational laxities of the reconstructed knee to the pre-deficient state for the arc of motion examined. The relative contribution of the reconstruction was higher in valgus rotation at 60° than the sMCL; otherwise, the contribution of the reconstruction was similar to that of the sMCL.

Conclusion: There is contention whether a CC-TKA can function with medial deficiency or more constraint is required. This work has shown that a CC-TKA may not provide enough stability with an absent sMCL. However, in such cases, combining the CC-TKA with a medial soft tissue reconstruction may be considered as an alternative to a hinged implant.

Keywords: Constrained implant; Knee replacement; Laxity; Medial collateral ligament; Reconstruction; Soft tissue deficiency; Stability; Total knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Graphic representation of the medial reconstruction in coronal (left) and posteromedial (central) views and in a cadaveric specimen (right)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percentage contributions of the deep and superficial medial collateral ligaments (dMCL and sMCL) and posteromedial capsule (PMC) in resisting 8 Nm valgus moment in implanted knees, Mean ± SD. Asterisk indicates a statistically significant contribution greater than 10 % at the specified flexion angle (p < 0.05)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Varus–valgus rotation of implanted knees with intact medial complex, and the same knees with the medial complex transected and a medial reconstruction, in response to a ± 8 Nm varus–valgus moment. Mean ± SD at each flexion angle. MCL medial collateral ligament (both superficial and deep), PMC posteromedial capsule
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Percentage contributions of the deep and superficial medial collateral ligaments (dMCL and sMCL) and posteromedial capsule (PMC) in resisting ± 50 N anterior–posterior force in implanted knees, Mean ± SD. Asterisk indicates a statistically significant contribution greater than 10 % at the specified flexion angle (p < 0.05)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Comparison of anterior–posterior translation of a implanted knees with intact medial complex, and b the same knees with medial complex transected and a medial reconstruction, in response to a ± 50 N anterior–posterior force. Error bars denote the standard deviation at each flexion angle. MCL medial collateral ligament (both superficial and deep), PMC posteromedial capsule
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Percentage contributions of the deep and superficial medial collateral ligaments (dMCL and sMCL) and posteromedial capsule (PMC) in resisting ± 5 Nm internal–external moment in implanted knees, Mean ± SD. Asterisk indicates a statistically significant contribution greater than 10 % at the specified flexion angle (p < 0.05)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Comparison of internal–external rotation of a implanted knees with intact medial complex, and b the same knees with medial complex transected and a medial reconstruction, in response to a ± 5 Nm internal–external moment. Mean ± SD. MCL medial collateral ligament (both superficial and deep), PMC posteromedial capsule

References

    1. Amis AA, Scammell BE. Biomechanics of intra-articular and extra-articular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:812–817. - PubMed
    1. Athwal KK, El Daou H, Kittl C, Davies AJ, Deehan DJ, Amis AA. The superficial medial collateral ligament is the primary medial restraint to knee laxity after cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty: effects of implant type and partial release. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 - PubMed
    1. Athwal KK, Hunt NC, Davies AJ, Deehan DJ, Amis AA. Clinical biomechanics of instability related to total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech. 2014;29:119–128. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.11.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bollen S. Epidemiology of knee injuries: diagnosis and triage. Br J Sports Med. 2000;34:227–228. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.34.3.227-a. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coobs BR, Wijdicks CA, Armitage BM, Spiridonov SI, Westerhaus BD, Johansen S, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF. An in vitro analysis of an anatomical medial knee reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:339–347. doi: 10.1177/0363546509347996. - DOI - PubMed