Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;23(6):1150-1158.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw025. Epub 2016 Mar 28.

Patients, care partners, and shared access to the patient portal: online practices at an integrated health system

Affiliations

Patients, care partners, and shared access to the patient portal: online practices at an integrated health system

Jennifer L Wolff et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the characteristics and online practices of patients and "care partners" who share explicit access to a patient portal account at a large integrated health system that implemented shared access functionality in 2003.

Materials and methods: Survey of 323 patients and 389 care partners at Geisinger Health System with linked information regarding access and use of patient portal functionality.

Results: Few (0.4%) registered adult patient portal users shared access to their account. Patients varied in age (range: 18-102); more than half had a high school education or less (53.6%). Patient motivations for sharing access included: to help manage care (41.9%), for emergency reasons (29.7%), lack of technology experience (18.4%), or care partner request (10.0%). Care partners were parents (39.8%), adult children (27.9%), spouses (26.2%), and other relatives (6.1%). Patients were more likely than care partners to have inadequate health literacy (54.8% versus 8.8%, P < .001) and less confident in their ability to manage their care (53.0% versus 88.1%; P < .001). Care partners were more likely than patients to perform health management activities electronically (95.5% versus 48.4%; P < .001), access the patient portal (89.2% versus 30.3%; P < .001), and use patient portal functionality such as secure messaging (39.6% versus 13.9%; P < .001). Care partners used their own credentials (89.1%) and patient credentials (23.3%) to access the patient portal.

Discussion and conclusion: Shared access is an underused strategy that may bridge patients' health literacy deficits and lack of technology experience and that helps but does not fully resolve concerns regarding patient and care partner identity credentials.

Keywords: consumer health information; electronic health records; health information technology; health literacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Patient and Care Partner Recruitment.

References

    1. Ricciardi L Mostashari F Murphy J Daniel JG Siminerio EP . A national action plan to support consumer engagement via e-health . Health Aff. 2013. ; 32 ( 2 ): 376 – 384 . - PubMed
    1. Delbanco T Walker J Bell SK et al. . Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead . AnnI Int Med. 2012. ; 157 ( 7 ): 461 – 470 . - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldzweig CL Orshansky G Paige NM et al. . Electronic patient portals: evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency, and attitudes: a systematic review . AnnI Int Med. 2013. ; 159 ( 10 ): 677 – 687 . - PubMed
    1. Ammenwerth E Schnell-Inderst P Hoerbst A . The impact of electronic patient portals on patient care: a systematic review of controlled trials . J Med Internet Res. 2012. ; 14 ( 6 ): e162 . - PMC - PubMed
    1. Otte-Trojel T de Bont A Rundall TG van de Klundert J . How outcomes are achieved through patient portals: a realist review . J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014. ; 21 ( 4 ): 751 – 757 . - PMC - PubMed