Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 17;46(4):417-9.
doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30255-X. eCollection 2011 Jul-Aug.

FEMORAL ROLL BACK IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: COMPARISON BETWEEN PROSTHESES THAT PRESERVE AND SACRIFICE THE POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT

Affiliations

FEMORAL ROLL BACK IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: COMPARISON BETWEEN PROSTHESES THAT PRESERVE AND SACRIFICE THE POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT

Lúcio Honório de Carvalho Júnior et al. Rev Bras Ortop. .

Abstract

To compare the rollback of the contact point between the femoral component and the tibial polyethylene as the knee is flexed, in two types of total knee arthroplasty: one that sacrifices and the other that preserves the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL).

Methods: Under fluoroscopy, 36 knees from 32 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty were evaluated. Using lateral images, the contact points between the femur and the tibial polyethylene with the knee in complete extension and at 90° of flexion were measured, thereby measuring the percentage rollback of the femur in arthroplasties in which the PCL was sacrificed and in those in which it was preserved.

Results: The mean percentage rollback of the femur was 13.24% in the cases in which the PCL was sacrificed and 5.75% in the cases in which it was preserved. The difference between these measurements was statistically significant (p = 0.026615).

Conclusion: In total knee arthroplasty, sacrificing the PCL increased the rollback of the contact point between the femur and tibia as the knee was flexed up to 90°.

Keywords: Arthroplasty; Articular; Biomechanics; Knee; Range of Motion; Replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image showing determination of the point of peak load-bearing in extension and flexion, for calculating the rollback rate.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Rollback of contact point between the femur and tibia in total knee arthroplasty, as the flexion increases.

References

    1. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Scuderi GR, Zingde S. Factors affecting flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:53–60. - PubMed
    1. Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA. Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;(192):13–22. - PubMed
    1. Victor J, Banks S, Bellemans J. Kinematics of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining and -substituting total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(5):646–655. - PubMed
    1. Li G, DeFrate LE, Park SE, Gill TJ, Rubash HE. In vivo articular cartilage contact kinematics of the knee: an investigation using dual-orthogonal fluoroscopy and magnetic resonance image-based computer models. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(1):102–107. - PubMed
    1. Victor J, Bellemans J. Physiologic kinematics as a concept for better flexion in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:53–58. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources