Ablation Versus Amiodarone for Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure and an Implanted Device: Results From the AATAC Multicenter Randomized Trial
- PMID: 27029350
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019406
Ablation Versus Amiodarone for Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure and an Implanted Device: Results From the AATAC Multicenter Randomized Trial
Abstract
Background: Whether catheter ablation (CA) is superior to amiodarone (AMIO) for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure is unknown.
Methods and results: This was an open-label, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study. Patients with persistent AF, dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator, New York Heart Association II to III, and left ventricular ejection fraction <40% within the past 6 months were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to undergo CA for AF (group 1, n=102) or receive AMIO (group 2, n=101). Recurrence of AF was the primary end point. All-cause mortality and unplanned hospitalization were the secondary end points. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months. At the end of follow-up, 71 (70%; 95% confidence interval, 60%-78%) patients in group 1 were recurrence free after an average of 1.4±0.6 procedures in comparison with 34 (34%; 95% confidence interval, 25%-44%) in group 2 (log-rank P<0.001). The success rate of CA in the different centers after a single procedure ranged from 29% to 61%. After adjusting for covariates in the multivariable model, AMIO therapy was found to be significantly more likely to fail (hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-4.3; P<0.001) than CA. Over the 2-year follow-up, the unplanned hospitalization rate was (32 [31%] in group 1 and 58 [57%] in group 2; P<0.001), showing 45% relative risk reduction (relative risk, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.76). A significantly lower mortality was observed in CA (8 [8%] versus AMIO (18 [18%]; P=0.037).
Conclusions: This multicenter randomized study shows that CA of AF is superior to AMIO in achieving freedom from AF at long-term follow-up and reducing unplanned hospitalization and mortality in patients with heart failure and persistent AF.
Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00729911.
Keywords: amiodarone; atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; heart failure.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.
Comment in
-
Letter from Turco Regarding Article, "Ablation Versus Amiodarone for Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure and an Implanted Device: Results From the AATAC Multicenter Randomized Trial".Circulation. 2016 Sep 6;134(10):e179-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023135. Circulation. 2016. PMID: 27601560 No abstract available.
-
Letter from Willey and Biviano Regarding Article, "Ablation Versus Amiodarone for Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure and an Implanted Device: Results From the AATAC Multicenter Randomized Trial".Circulation. 2016 Sep 6;134(10):e181-2. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023261. Circulation. 2016. PMID: 27601561 No abstract available.
-
Letter from Kosiuk et al Regarding Article, "Ablation Versus Amiodarone for Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure and an Implanted Device: Results From the AATAC Multicenter Randomized Trial".Circulation. 2016 Sep 6;134(10):e183-4. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023334. Circulation. 2016. PMID: 27601562 No abstract available.
-
Letter from Liu and Yang Regarding Article, "Ablation Versus Amiodarone for Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure and an Implanted Device: Results From the AATAC Multicenter Randomized Trial".Circulation. 2016 Sep 6;134(10):e185-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022820. Circulation. 2016. PMID: 27601563 No abstract available.
-
Letter from Skolnik Regarding Article, "Ablation Versus Amiodarone for Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure and an Implanted Device: Results From the AATAC Multicenter Randomized Trial".Circulation. 2016 Sep 6;134(10):e187-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023385. Circulation. 2016. PMID: 27601564 No abstract available.
-
Response by Di Biase et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Ablation Versus Amiodarone for Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure and an Implanted Device: Results From the AATAC Multicenter Randomized Trial".Circulation. 2016 Sep 6;134(10):e189-90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024003. Circulation. 2016. PMID: 27601565 No abstract available.
-
Pursuing early catheter ablation to treat atrial fibrillation in the congestive heart failure population: significance of the AATAC trial results.J Thorac Dis. 2016 Aug;8(8):1913-5. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.06.78. J Thorac Dis. 2016. PMID: 27619629 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous