Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 30;18(3):e73.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.4973.

Personal Health Record Use in the United States: Forecasting Future Adoption Levels

Affiliations

Personal Health Record Use in the United States: Forecasting Future Adoption Levels

Eric W Ford et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Personal health records (PHRs) offer a tremendous opportunity to generate consumer support in pursing the triple aim of reducing costs, increasing access, and improving care quality. Moreover, surveys in the United States indicate that consumers want Web-based access to their medical records. However, concerns that consumers' low health information literacy levels and physicians' resistance to sharing notes will limit PHRs' utility to a relatively small portion of the population have reduced both the product innovation and policy imperatives.

Objective: The purpose of our study was 3-fold: first, to report on US consumers' current level of PHR activity; second, to describe the roles of imitation and innovation influence factors in determining PHR adoption rates; and third, to forecast future PHR diffusion uptake among US consumers under 3 scenarios.

Methods: We used secondary data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) of US citizens for the survey years 2008, 2011, and 2013. Applying technology diffusion theory and Bass modeling, we evaluated 3 future PHR adoption scenarios by varying the introduction dates.

Results: All models displayed the characteristic diffusion S-curve indicating that the PHR technology is likely to achieve significant market penetration ahead of meaningful use goals. The best-performing model indicates that PHR adoption will exceed 75% by 2020. Therefore, the meaningful use program targets for PHR adoption are below the rates likely to occur without an intervention.

Conclusions: The promise of improved care quality and cost savings through better consumer engagement prompted the US Institute of Medicine to call for universal PHR adoption in 1999. The PHR products available as of 2014 are likely to meet and exceed meaningful use stage 3 targets before 2020 without any incentive. Therefore, more ambitious uptake and functionality availability should be incorporated into future goals.

Keywords: Bass modeling; PHR Adoption Forecasts; electronic health records; patient participation; personal health records; technology diffusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Projected diffusion patterns for Internet-based personal health record adoption in the United States, by year of introduction. MU: meaningful use incentive program of the US Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act.

References

    1. Appari A, Eric JM, Anthony DL. Meaningful use of electronic health record systems and process quality of care: evidence from a panel data analysis of U.S. acute-care hospitals. Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr;48(2 Pt 1):354–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01448.x. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22816527 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilson JF. Making electronic health records meaningful. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):293–6.151/4/293 - PubMed
    1. Blumenthal D, DesRoches C, Donelan K, Rosenbaum S, Ferris T. Health Information Technology in the United States: The Information Base for Progress. Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2006.
    1. Stead WW, Lin HS, Committee on Engaging the Computer Science Research Community in Health Care Informatics. National Research Council . Computational Technology for Effective Health Care: Immediate Steps and Strategic Directions. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009. - PubMed
    1. Vila P, Pfeffer M. Finding meaning in the electronic health records (EHR) meaningful use incentive program. Proc UCLA Health Network. 2014 Sep 16;18 http://www.med.ucla.edu/modules/xfsection/cache/uploaded/A140801MP-CB_ed...