Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD011390.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011390.pub2.

Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy  1 , Elena Pallari, Sumit Midya, Muntzer Mughal
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Surgery is the preferred treatment for resectable oesophageal cancers, and can be performed in different ways. Transhiatal oesophagectomy (oesophagectomy without thoracotomy, with a cervical anastomosis) is one way to resect oesophageal cancers. It can be performed laparoscopically or by open method. With other organs, laparoscopic surgery has been shown to reduce complications and length of hospital stay compared to open surgery. However, concerns remain about the safety of laparoscopic transhiatal oesophagectomy in terms of post-operative complications and oncological clearance compared with open transhiatal oesophagectomy.

Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of laparoscopic versus open oesophagectomy for people with oesophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal oesophagectomy.

Search methods: We electronically searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and trials registers until August 2015. We also searched the references of included trials to identify further trials.

Selection criteria: We considered randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies comparing laparoscopic with open transhiatal oesophagectomy in patients with resectable oesophageal cancer, regardless of language, blinding, or publication status for the review.

Data collection and analysis: Three review authors independently identified trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) or hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), using both fixed-effect and random-effects models, with RevMan 5, based on intention-to-treat analyses.

Main results: We found no randomised controlled trials on this topic. We included six non-randomised studies (five retrospective) that compared laparoscopic versus open transhiatal oesophagectomy (334 patients: laparoscopic = 154 patients; open = 180 patients); five studies (326 patients: laparoscopic = 151 patients; open = 175 patients) provided information for one or more outcomes. Most studies included a mixture of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma and different stages of oesophageal cancer, without metastases. All the studies were at unclear or high risk of bias; the overall quality of evidence was very low for all the outcomes.The differences between laparoscopic and open transhiatal oesophagectomy were imprecise for short-term mortality (laparoscopic = 0/151 (adjusted proportion based on meta-analysis estimate: 0.5%) versus open = 2/175 (1.1%); RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.05 to 4.09; participants = 326; studies = 5; I² = 0%); long-term mortality (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.16; participants = 193; studies = 2; I² = 0%); anastomotic stenosis (laparoscopic = 4/36 (11.1%) versus open = 3/37 (8.1%); RR 1.37; 95% CI 0.33 to 5.70; participants = 73; studies = 1); short-term recurrence (laparoscopic = 1/16 (6.3%) versus open = 0/4 (0%); RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.04 to 18.47; participants = 20; studies = 1); long-term recurrence (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.18; participants = 173; studies = 2); proportion of people who required blood transfusion (laparoscopic = 0/36 (0%) versus open = 6/37 (16.2%); RR 0.08; 95% CI 0.00 to 1.35; participants = 73; studies = 1); proportion of people with positive resection margins (laparoscopic = 15/102 (15.8%) versus open = 27/111 (24.3%); RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.37 to 1.12; participants = 213; studies = 3; I² = 0%); and the number of lymph nodes harvested during surgery (median difference between the groups varied from 12 less to 3 more lymph nodes in the laparoscopic compared to the open group; participants = 326; studies = 5).The proportion of patients with serious adverse events was lower in the laparoscopic group (10/99, (10.3%) compared to the open group = 24/114 (21.1%); RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.99; participants = 213; studies = 3; I² = 0%); as it was for adverse events in the laparoscopic group = 37/99 (39.9%) versus the open group = 71/114 (62.3%); RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.86; participants = 213; studies = 3; I² = 0%); and the median lengths of hospital stay were significantly less in the laparoscopic group than the open group (three days less in all three studies that reported this outcome; number of participants = 266). There was lack of clarity as to whether the median difference in the quantity of blood transfused was statistically significant favouring laparoscopic oesophagectomy in the only study that reported this information. None of the studies reported post-operative dysphagia, health-related quality of life, time-to-return to normal activity (return to pre-operative mobility without caregiver support), or time-to-return to work.

Authors' conclusions: There are currently no randomised controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open transhiatal oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancers. In observational studies, laparoscopic transhiatal oesophagectomy is associated with fewer overall complications and shorter hospital stays than open transhiatal oesophagectomy. However, this association is unlikely to be causal. There is currently no information to determine a causal association in the differences between the two surgical approaches. Randomised controlled trials comparing laparoscopic transhiatal oesophagectomy with other methods of oesophagectomy are required to determine the optimal method of oesophagectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This report is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR Cochrane Programme Grants, 13/89/03 ‐ Evidence‐based diagnosis and management of upper digestive, hepato‐biliary, and pancreatic disorders). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Health Service (NHS), the National Institute for Health Research, or the Department of Health.

KG: none known.

EP: none known.

SM: none known.

MM: none known.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Badessi 2003 {published data only}
    1. Badessi F, Gusai GP, Fais D, Huscher C. Traditional esophagectomy and esophago‐gastrectomy vs. laparoscopic surgery. Evaluation and results. Tumori 2003;89(4 Suppl):80‐3. - PubMed
Cash 2014 {published data only}
    1. Cash JC, Zehetner J, Hedayati B, Bildzukewicz NA, Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, et al. Outcomes following laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgical Endoscopy 2014;28(2):492‐9. - PubMed
    1. Cash JC, Zehetner J, Heyadati B, Crookes PF, Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, et al. Outcome following laparoscopic trans‐hiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgical Endoscopy 2013;27:S267. - PubMed
Ecker 2015 {published data only}
    1. Ecker B, Savulionyte G, Datta J, Dumon K, Williams N, Kucharczuk J, et al. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy improves hospital outcomes and reduces cost: A single‐institution cohort analysis of laparoscopic and open techniques. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2015;1:S154. - PubMed
Maas 2012 {published data only}
    1. Maas KW, Biere SS, Scheepers JJ, Gisbertz SS, van‐der‐Peet DL, Cuesta MA. Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal esophagectomy for distal and junction cancer. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas 2012;104(4):197‐202. - PubMed
    1. Makay O, Broek WT, Yuan JZ, Veerman DP, Helfferich DW, Cuesta MA. Anesthesiological hazards during laparoscopic transhiatal esophageal resection: A case control study of the laparoscopic‐assisted vs the conventional approach. Surgical Endoscopy 2004;18(8):1263‐7. - PubMed
    1. Broek WT, Makay O, Berends FJ, Yuan JZ, Houdijk APJ, Meijer S, et al. Erratum: Laparoscopically assisted transhiatal resection for malignancies of the distal esophagus. Surgical Endoscopy 2004;18(8):1292. - PubMed
    1. Broek WT, Makay O, Berends FJ, Yuan JZ, Houdijk AP, Meijer S, et al. Laparoscopically assisted transhiatal resection for malignancies of the distal esophagus. Surgical Endoscopy 2004;18(5):812‐7. - PubMed
Saha 2009 {published data only}
    1. Saha AK, Sutton CD, Sue‐Ling H, Dexter SP, Sarela AI. Comparison of oncological outcomes after laparoscopic transhiatal and open esophagectomy for T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma. Surgical Endoscopy 2009;23(1):119‐24. - PubMed
Valenti 2008 {published data only}
    1. Valenti AV, Fares R, Reynolds N, Cohen P, Theodoro N, Martinez‐Isla A. Open and laparoscopic transhiatal oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus: Analysis of resection margins and lymph nodes. Cirugia Espanola 2008;83(1):24‐7. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Bernabe 2005 {published data only}
    1. Bernabe KQ, Bolton JS, Richardson WS. Laparoscopic hand‐assisted versus open transhiatal esophagectomy: A case‐control study. Surgical Endoscopy 2005;19(3):334‐7. - PubMed
Blazeby 2011 {published data only}
    1. Blazeby JM, Blencowe NS, Titcomb DR, Metcalfe C, Hollowood AD, Barham CP. Demonstration of the ideal recommendations for evaluating and reporting surgical innovation in minimally invasive oesophagectomy. British Journal of Surgery 2011;98(4):544‐51. - PubMed
Bresadola 2006 {published data only}
    1. Bresadola V, Terrosu G, Cojutti A, Benzoni E, Baracchini E, Bresadola F. Laparoscopic versus open gastroplasty in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A comparative study. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques 2006;16(2):63‐7. - PubMed
Burdall 2015 {published data only}
    1. Burdall OC, Boddy AP, Fullick J, Blazeby J, Krysztopik R, Streets C, et al. A comparative study of survival after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy. Surgical Endoscopy 2015;29(2):431‐7. - PubMed
    1. Burdall OC, Fullick J, Boddy AP, Blazeby J, Krysztopik R, Streets C, et al. Improved survival following minimally invasive oesophagectomy compared to open surgery. Surgical Endoscopy 2014;28:254. - PubMed
Csendes 2013 {published data only}
    1. Csendes A, Braghetto I, Cardemil G, Cortes S, Musleh M. Results of esophagectomy among patients with esophageal cancer and Barrett esophagus. Revista Chilena De Cirugia 2013;65(2):121‐7.
Cuesta 2012 {published data only}
    1. Cuesta MA, Biere S, Berge Henegouwen MI, Peet DL. Randomised trial, minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open oesophagectomy for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. Journal of Thoracic Disease 2012;4(5):462‐4. - PMC - PubMed
Dolan 2013 {published data only}
    1. Dolan JP, Kaur T, Diggs BS, Luna RA, Schipper PH, Tieu BH, et al. Impact of comorbidity on outcomes and overall survival after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Surgical Endoscopy 2013;27(11):4094‐103. - PMC - PubMed
Fabian 2008 {published data only}
    1. Fabian T, Martin JT, McKelvey AA, Federico JA. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: A teaching hospital's first year experience. Diseases of the Esophagus 2008;21(3):220‐5. - PubMed
Ferreira 2004 {published data only}
    1. Ferreira EAB. Is there a role for minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of esophageal cancer?. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. 2004:53‐7.
Harrison 2013 {published data only}
    1. Harrison M, Titcomb D, Sychev I. Do laparoscopically‐assisted and minimally invasive oesophagectomies improve outcomes when compared to the traditional open method?. International Journal of Surgery 2013;11(8):718.
Kang 2013 {published data only}
    1. Kang CH, Hwang YH, Kim HS, Jheon JH, Han KN, Park IK, et al. Long‐term survival after minimally invasive oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer is comparable to open oesophagectomy: A propensity score‐matched study. Interactive Cardiovascular &Thoracic Surgery 2013;17:S142.
Lee 2013 {published data only}
    1. Lee L, Sudarshan M, Li C, Latimer E, Fried GM, Mulder DS, et al. Cost‐effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2013;20(12):3732‐9. - PubMed
Mamidanna 2012 {published data only}
    1. Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, Faiz O, Hanna GB. Short‐term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: A population‐based national study. Annals of Surgery 2012;255(2):197‐203. - PubMed
Mao 2012 {published data only}
    1. Mao T, Fang WT, Gu ZT, Yao F, Guo XF, Chen WH. Comparative study of perioperative complications and lymphadenectomy between minimally invasive esophagectomy and open procedure. Zhonghua Weichang Waike Zazhi 2012;15(9):922‐5. - PubMed
Mariette 2012 {published data only}
    1. Mariette C, Robb WB. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer. The Lancet 2012;380(9845):883. - PubMed
Messenger 2015 {published data only}
    1. Messenger DE, Higgs SM, Dwerryhouse SJ, Hewin DF, Vipond MN, Barr H, et al. Symptomatic diaphragmatic herniation following open and minimally invasive oesophagectomy: Experience from a UK specialist unit. Surgical Endoscopy 2015;29(2):417‐24. - PubMed
Parameswaran 2013 {published data only}
    1. Parameswaran R, Titcomb DR, Blencowe NS, Berrisford RG, Wajed SA, Streets CG, et al. Assessment and comparison of recovery after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: An exploratory study in two centers. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2013;20(6):1970‐7. - PubMed
Perry 2009 {published data only}
    1. Perry KA, Enestvedt CK, Pham T, Welker M, Jobe BA, Hunter JG, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy and open transhiatal esophagectomy for high‐grade dysplasia and Stage I esophageal adenocarcinoma. Archives of Surgery 2009;144(7):679‐84. - PubMed
Rice 2012 {published data only}
    1. Rice TW, Blackstone EH. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: More questions than answers. Annals of Surgery 2012;255(2):204‐5. - PubMed
Safranek 2010 {published data only}
    1. Safranek PM, Cubitt J, Booth MI, Dehn TC. Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer. British Journal of Surgery 2010;97(12):1845‐53. - PubMed
Scheepers 2008 {published data only}
    1. Scheepers JJ, Veenhof AA, Peet DL, Groeningen C, Mulder C, Meijer S, et al. Laparoscopic transhiatal resection for malignancies of the distal esophagus: Outcome of the first 50 resected patients. Surgery 2008;143(2):278‐85. - PubMed
Schoppmann 2010 {published data only}
    1. Schoppmann SF, Prager G, Langer FB, Riegler FM, Kabon B, Fleischmann E, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single‐center case controlled study. Surgical Endoscopy 2010;24(12):3044‐53. - PubMed
Ujiki 2013 {published data only}
    1. Ujiki MB, Perry K, Velasco J, Kim AW. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with antegrade esophageal inversion for high‐grade dysplasia and invasive esophageal cancer discussion. Surgery 2013;154(4):907‐8. - PubMed
Yamasaki 2011 {published data only}
    1. Yamasaki M, Miyata H, Fujiwara Y, Takiguchi S, Nakajima K, Kurokawa Y, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Comparative analysis of open and hand‐assisted laparoscopic abdominal lymphadenectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. Journal of Surgical Oncology 2011;104(6):623‐8. - PubMed

Additional references

AJCC 2010
    1. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th Edition. New York: Springer, 2010.
Allum 2011
    1. Allum WH, Blazeby JM, Griffin SM, Cunningham D, Jankowski JA, Wong R. Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut 2011;60(11):1449‐72. - PubMed
ASA 2014
    1. American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA physical status classification system. Available from: www.asahq.org/Home/For‐Members/Clinical‐Information/ASA‐Physical‐Status‐... (accessed 16 November 2014).
Avital 2005
    1. Avital S, Zundel N, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. American Journal of Surgery 2005;190(1):69‐74. - PubMed
Bijen 2009
    1. Bijen CB, Vermeulen KM, Mourits MJ, Bock GH. Costs and effects of abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of controlled trials. PLoS One 2009;4(10):e7340. - PMC - PubMed
Boshier 2011
    1. Boshier PR, Anderson O, Hanna GB. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for the treatment of esophagogastric cancer: a meta‐analysis. Annals of Surgery 2011;254(6):894‐906. - PubMed
Cancer Research UK 2014
    1. Cancer Research UK. Oesophageal cancer incidence statistics. Available from: www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer‐info/cancerstats/types/oesophagus/incide... (accessed 16 November 2014).
Clavien 2009
    1. Clavien PA, Barkun J, Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien‐Dindo classification of surgical complications: five‐year experience. Annals of Surgery 2009;250(2):187‐96. - PubMed
Colvin 2011
    1. Colvin H, Dunning J, Khan OA. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for distal esophageal cancer: which is superior?. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 2011;12(2):265‐9. - PubMed
Demets 1987
    1. Demets DL. Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: strengths and limitations. Statistics in Medicine 1987;6(3):341‐50. - PubMed
DerSimonian 1986
    1. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta‐analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7(3):177‐88. - PubMed
Dindo 2004
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of Surgery 2004;240(2):205‐13. - PMC - PubMed
Egger 1997
    1. Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta‐analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 1997;315(7109):629‐34. - PMC - PubMed
Fovos 2012
    1. Fovos A, Jarral O, Panagiotopoulos N, Podas T, Mikhail S, Zacharakis E. Does endoscopic treatment for early oesophageal cancers give equivalent oncological outcomes as compared with oesophagectomy? Best evidence topic (BET). International Journal of Surgery (London, England) 2012;10(9):415‐20. - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Hopkins 1999
    1. Hopkins MP, Dulai RM, Occhino A, Holda S. The effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on seeding of tumor in port sites in a rat model. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999;181(6):1329‐34. - PubMed
IARC 2014
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2012. Available from: globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx (accessed 16 November 2014).
ICH‐GCP 1996
    1. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Code of Federal Regulation & ICH Guidelines. Media: Parexel Barnett, 1996.
Kais 2014
    1. Kais H, Hershkovitz Y, Sandbank J, Halevy A. Port site metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the gallbladder. Israel Medical Association Journal 2014;16(3):177‐9. - PubMed
Keus 2006
    1. Keus F, Jong JA, Gooszen HG, Laarhoven CJ. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006231] - DOI - PubMed
McKeown 1976
    1. McKeown KC. Total three‐stage oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus. British Journal of Surgery 1976;63(4):259‐62. - PubMed
Omloo 2007
    1. Omloo JM, Lagarde SM, Hulscher JB, Reitsma JB, Fockens P, Dekken H, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five‐year survival of a randomized clinical trial. Annals of Surgery 2007;246(6):992‐1000; discussion 1000‐1. - PubMed
Orringer 2007
    1. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC, Lee J, Pickens A, Lau CL. Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned. Annals of Surgery 2007;246(3):363‐72; discussion 372‐4. - PMC - PubMed
Palomba 2014
    1. Palomba S, Mandato VD, Sala GB. Isolated port‐site metastasis after robotic hysterectomy for Stage IA endometrial adenocarcinoma. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2014;123(3):664. - PubMed
Parmar 1998
    1. Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta‐analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Statistics in Medicine 1998;17(24):2815‐34. - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Reza 2006
    1. Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, Cantero R, Mayol J. Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery 2006;93(8):921‐8. - PubMed
Rice 2010
    1. Rice TW, Blackstone EH, Rusch VW. 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2010;17(7):1721‐4. - PubMed
Sjoquist 2011
    1. Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Zalcberg JR, Simes RJ, Barbour A, et al. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta‐analysis. The Lancet Oncology 2011;12(7):681‐92. - PubMed
Song 2014
    1. Song J, Kim E, Mobley J, Vemana G, Tanagho Y, Vetter J, et al. Port site metastasis after surgery for renal cell carcinoma: harbinger of future metastasis. Journal of Urology 2014;192(2):364‐8. - PubMed
Stahl 2013
    1. Stahl M, Mariette C, Haustermans K, Cervantes A, Arnold D, Group EGW. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up. Annals of Oncology 2013;24(Suppl 6):vi51‐6. - PubMed
Sterne 2014
    1. Sterne JAC, Higgins JPT, Reeves BC on behalf of the development group for ACROBAT‐NRSI. A Cochrane Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool: for Non‐Randomized Studies of Interventions (ACROBAT‐NRSI), Version 1.0.0. Available from http://www.riskofbias.info (accessed on 25th November 2015)..
Talseth 2014
    1. Talseth A, Lydersen S, Skjedlestad F, Hveem K, Edna TH. Trends in cholecystectomy rates in a defined population during and after the period of transition from open to laparoscopic surgery. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 2014;49(1):92‐8. - PubMed
Walsh 2009
    1. Walsh CA, Walsh SR, Tang TY, Slack M. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta‐analysis. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2009;144(1):3‐7. - PubMed
Yamamoto 2013
    1. Yamamoto M, Weber JM, Karl RC, Meredith KL. Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer: review of the literature and institutional experience. Cancer Control 2013;20(2):130‐7. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources