Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Jul 1;21(4):e505-13.
doi: 10.4317/medoral.21074.

Coronectomy of impacted mandibular third molars: A meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature

J Cervera-Espert  1 , S Pérez-Martínez, J Cervera-Ballester, D Peñarrocha-Oltra, M Peñarrocha-Diago
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Coronectomy of impacted mandibular third molars: A meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature

J Cervera-Espert et al. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. .

Abstract

Background: Coronectomy is an alternative to complete removal of an impacted mandibular third molar. Most authors have recommended coronectomy to prevent damage to the inferior alveolar nerve during surgical extraction of lower third molars. The present study offers a systematic review and metaanalysis of the coronectomy technique.

Material and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed based on a PubMed and Cochrane databases search for articles published from 2014 and involving coronectomy of mandibular third molars located near the inferior alveolar nerve canal, with a minimum of 10 cases and a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. After application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 12 articles were included in the study.

Results and discussion: Coronectomy results in significantly lesser loss of sensitivity of the inferior alveolar nerve and prevents the occurrence of dry socket. No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of pain and infection between coronectomy and complete surgical extraction. After coronectomy, the remaining tooth fragment migrates an average of 2 mm within two years.

Conclusions: Coronectomy is indicated when the mandibular third molar is in contact with the inferior alveolar nerve and complete removal of the tooth may cause nerve damage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart for the systematic review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot for the incidence of the different complications (OR).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot for the incidence of the different complications (metaregression analysis).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Knutsson K, Lysell L, Rohlin M. Postoperative status after partial removal of the mandibular third molar. Swed Dent J. 1989;13:15–22. - PubMed
    1. Sisk AL, Hammer WB, Shelton DW, Joy ED Jr. Complications following removal of impacted third molars: the role of the experience of the surgeon. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;44:855–9. - PubMed
    1. Blondeau F. [Paresthesia: incidence following the extraction of 455 mandibular impacted third molars] J Can Dent Assoc. 1994;60:991–4. - PubMed
    1. Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Inferior alveolar nerve damage after lower third molar surgical extraction: A prospective study of 1117 surgical extractions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92:377. - PubMed
    1. Queral-Godoy E, Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Incidence and evolution of inferior alveolar nerve lesions following lower third molar extraction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99:259–64. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources