Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 May;11(4):203-6.
doi: 10.1089/bfm.2016.0017. Epub 2016 Mar 31.

Association of Etonogestrel-Releasing Contraceptive Implant with Reduced Weight Gain in an Exclusively Breastfed Infant: Report and Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

Association of Etonogestrel-Releasing Contraceptive Implant with Reduced Weight Gain in an Exclusively Breastfed Infant: Report and Literature Review

Alison M Stuebe et al. Breastfeed Med. 2016 May.

Abstract

Background: Studies have not found that hormonal contraceptive implants adversely affect breastfeeding, but theoretical concerns exist.

Methods: We reported a case of reduced weight gain in an exclusively breastfed infant in association with placement of (ENG)-releasing contraceptive implant (Nexplanon) to the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS). We further queried reports to FAERS and reviewed published studies of the ENG implant during breastfeeding.

Results: A breastfeeding mother received an ENG implant at 4 weeks postpartum. Her infant was exclusively breastfeeding. One month after implant placement, the infant had lost 145 g, dropping from the 44th percentile to the 6th percentile for growth. During this period, the mother had not returned to work or decreased frequency of feeding. During a 2-year period of FAERS reports, we found one other report of reduced milk supply following ENG implant placement. Among 108 breastfeeding women studied while using the ENG implant, there was one case of lactation failure. If this were not due to chance, the estimated risk of lactation failure with the ENG implant would be 0.9% (95% confidence interval 0.2-5.1%).

Conclusion: Given uncertainty regarding the true effect of ENG implants on lactation, it seems prudent for providers to counsel each woman about a possible effect on milk supply so that she can monitor her infant for signs of impaired milk transfer. Patient-centered counseling approaches are needed that allow each woman to assess her own individual tolerance of risk of unplanned pregnancy versus possible risk of lactation failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

<b>FIG. 1.</b>
FIG. 1.
Infant weight trajectory before and after placement of an etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant, compared with WHO growth percentiles for exclusively breastfed male infants.

References

    1. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): Latest quarterly data files. Available at www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Surveillance/A... (accessed December2, 2016)
    1. Pang WW, Hartmann PE. Initiation of human lactation: Secretory differentiation and secretory activation. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2007;12:211–221 - PubMed
    1. Bohler E, Bergstrom S. Child growth during weaning depends on whether mother is pregnant again. J Trop Pediatr 1996;42:104–109 - PubMed
    1. Lopez LM, Grey TW, Stuebe AM, et al. . Combined hormonal versus nonhormonal versus progestin-only contraception in lactation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;3:Cd003988. - PMC - PubMed
    1. LABEL: NEXPLANON- Etonogestrel Implant. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=b03a3917-9a65-4... (accessed February20, 2016)

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources