Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug;68(2):213-21.
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.02.042. Epub 2016 Mar 29.

The Association Between Limited English Proficiency and Unplanned Emergency Department Revisit Within 72 Hours

Ka Ming Ngai  1 , Corita R Grudzen  2 , Roy Lee  3 , Vicky Y Tong  4 , Lynne D Richardson  5 , Alicia Fernandez  6
Affiliations

The Association Between Limited English Proficiency and Unplanned Emergency Department Revisit Within 72 Hours

Ka Ming Ngai et al. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Study objective: Language barriers are known to negatively affect many health outcomes among limited English proficiency patient populations, but little is known about the quality of care such patients receive in the emergency department (ED). This study seeks to determine whether limited English proficiency patients experience different quality of care than English-speaking patients in the ED, using unplanned revisit within 72 hours as a surrogate quality indicator.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in an urban adult ED in 2012, with a total of 41,772 patients and 56,821 ED visits. We compared 2,943 limited English proficiency patients with 38,829 English-speaking patients presenting to the ED after excluding patients with psychiatric complaints, altered mental status, and nonverbal states, and those with more than 4 ED visits in 12 months. Two main outcomes-the risk of inpatient admission from the ED and risk of unplanned ED revisit within 72 hours-were measured with odds ratios from generalized estimating equation multivariate models.

Results: Limited English proficiency patients were more likely than English speakers to be admitted (32.0% versus 27.2%; odds ratio [OR]=1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11 to 1.30). This association became nonsignificant after adjustments (OR=1.04; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.15). Included in the analysis of ED revisit within 72 hours were 32,857 patients with 45,546 ED visits; 4.2% of all patients (n=1,380) had at least 1 unplanned revisit. Limited English proficiency patients were more likely than English speakers to have an unplanned revisit (5.0% versus 4.1%; OR=1.19; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.45). This association persisted (OR=1.24; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.53) after adjustment for potential confounders, including insurance status.

Conclusion: We found no difference in hospital admission rates between limited English proficiency patients and English-speaking patients. Yet limited English proficiency patients were 24% more likely to have an unplanned ED revisit within 72 hours, with an absolute difference of 0.9%, suggesting challenges in ED quality of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none were reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow of Participants through Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Shin H, Kominski R. Language Use in the United States: 2007. [November 12, 2011];2010 http://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/acs-12.pdf.
    1. 42 U.S.C. §2000d. 1964
    1. Services USDoHH. The National CLAS Standards. [July 1st, 2013]; http://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/templates/browse.aspx?lvl=2&lvlID=15.
    1. The Joint Commission: R3 Report Requirement, Rationale, Reference. 2011;(1)
    1. The Joint Commission: Advancing Effective Communication, Cultural Competence, and Patient and Family-Centered Care: A Roadmap for Hospitals. 2010