Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016;19(1):25-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.12.005.

A comparative study between Marshall and Rotterdam CT scores in predicting early deaths in patients with traumatic brain injury in a major tertiary care hospital in Nepal

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparative study between Marshall and Rotterdam CT scores in predicting early deaths in patients with traumatic brain injury in a major tertiary care hospital in Nepal

Sunil Munakomi. Chin J Traumatol. 2016.

Abstract

Purpose: CT plays a crucial role in the early assessment of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Marshall and Rotterdam are the mostly used scoring systems, in which CT findings are grouped differently. We sought to determine the values of the scoring system and initial CT findings in predicting the death at hospital discharge (early death) in patients with TBI.

Methods: There were consecutive 634 traumatic neurosurgical patients with mild-to-severe TBI admitted to the emergency department of College of Medical Sciences. Their initial CT and status at hospital discharge (dead or alive) were reviewed, and both CT scores were calculated. We examined whether each score is related to early death; compared the two scoring systems' performance in predicting early death, and identified the CT findings that are independent predictors for early death.

Results: Both imaging score (Marshall) and clinical score (Rotterdam) can be used to reliably predict mortality in patients with acute traumatic brain injury with high prognostic accuracy. Other specific CT characteristics that can be used to predict early mortality are traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, midline shift and status of the peri-mesencephalic cisterns.

Conclusions: Marshall CT classification has strong predictive power, but greater discrimination can be obtained if the individual CT parameters underlying the CT classification are included in a prognostic model as in Rotterdam score. Consequently, for prognostic purposes, we recommend the use of individual characteristics rather than the CT classification. Performance of CT models for predicting outcome in TBI can be significantly improved by including more details of variables and by adding other variables to the models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Relationship between Marshall score and mortality.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship between Rotterdam score and mortality.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Rotterdam score in moderate and severe head injuries.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Significance of other individual variables in the study model.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Teasdale G., Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2:81–84. - PubMed
    1. Malec J.F., Brown A.W., Leibson C.L. The Mayo classification system for traumatic brain injury severity. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:1417–1424. - PubMed
    1. Balestreri M., Czosnyka M., Chatfield D.A. Predictive value of glasgow coma scale after brain trauma: change in trend over the past ten years. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75:161–162. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buechler C.M., Blostein P.A., Koestner A. Variation among trauma centers' calculation of glasgow coma scale score: results of a national survey. J Trauma. 1998;45:429–432. - PubMed
    1. Moskopp D., Stähle C., Wassmann H. Problems of the glasgow coma scale with early intubated patients. Neurosurg Rev. 1995;18:253–257. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms